Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:11-cv-00861_de9> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00861_de9 RegisterActionDate "2012-01-30" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00861_de9 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is granted in light of the additional financial information supplied by Plaintiff. The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff the forms necessary to issue summons, and the Marshals Service is directed to serve the summons on Defendant. Plaintiff's renewed motion for appointment of counsel contained R. 9 is denied, applying the standard articulated in Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F. 3d 647, 654 55(7th Cir. 2007) (en banc). Unlike the first appointment motion, Plaintiff now at least alleges that she has sought representation, compare R. 9 with R. 5, but at this stage of the litigation, the case is relatively straightforward both as a factual matter (the allegations are expressed in 1 paragraph, R.1) and a legal matter (a simple alleged trademark violation). Moreover, Plaintiff states that she has an education background that includes post-graduate work, R.5, and the filings to-date show that she is able to competently articulate the factual contentions. For now. Plaintiff appears to be competent to litigate the case herself. Status hearing set for March 8, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. Mailed notices. (gcy, ) (Entered: 01/31/2012)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00861_de9 AdministrativeID "10" @default.
- ilnd;;1:11-cv-00861_de9 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:11-cv-00861_de3 @default.