Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:15-cv-05650_de33> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 3 of
3
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-05650_de33 RegisterActionDate "2015-10-22" @default.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-05650_de33 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Plaintiffs' statement of jurisdiction is still insufficient. Allegations based solely upon information and belief are insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. See Multi-M Int'l, Inc. v. Paige Med Supply Co., 142 F.R.D. 150, 152 (N.D. Ill. 1992). Thus, the allegations concerning Defendant Fox's domicile cannot stand. The Court further orders Plaintiffs to properly allege the citizenship of DM Partners, See Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998) (explaining that unincorporated enterprises, such as partnerships, take the citizen ship of every general and limited partner). Thus, Plaintiffs must sufficiently allege the following: (1) the state of which any natural person who is a member of DM Partners is a citizen, meaning the state where that person is domiciled; (2) the state where any corporation that is a member of DM Partners is incorporated and the state the corporation maintains its principal place of business; (3) the state if citizenship of the trustee or trustees of any trust that is a member of DM Partners, unless the law under which the trust is organized permist the the trust to sue and be sued in its own name, in which case the citizenship of the trust is that of its beneficiary or beneficiaries; and (4) if any member of DM Partners is itself a partnership, LLC, or unincorporated association, the citizenship of every member of such association. See Phamerica Corp. v. Crestwood Care, LLC, No. 13 C 1422, 2015 WL 1006683, at *3-4 (N.D.Ill. March 2, 2015). A further statement properly alleging jurisdiction is due by 10/30/15. Mailed notice (cjg, ) (Entered: 10/22/2015)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-05650_de33 AdministrativeID "29" @default.