Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:15-cv-07705_de9> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-07705_de9 RegisterActionDate "2015-11-12" @default.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-07705_de9 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: On 9/29/15, the court directed plaintiff to explain why this case should not be dismissed based on the statute of limitations. Plaintiff has responded, and filed a motion "to grant statute of limitations." 9 . To the extent the motion requests that the court determine that the statute of limitations is not a barrier to plaintiff's Monell claim, the motion is denied. But dismissal of this case would not be appropriate either. Plaintiff has adequately suggested that the statute of limitations question may be debatable. Given the complexity of both the statute of limitations and substantive Monell issues, and the fact that plaintiff's proposed complaint in this case is clearly a copy of the complaint proposed by his attorneys in case number 13-cv-8306, the court, on its own motion, recruits counsel to represent plaintiff. In accordance with his trial bar obligations under Local Rule 83.37, the court recruits Jeffrey Singer, Segal McCambridge, Singer & Mahoney, Ltd., 233 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5500, Chicago, IL 60606, to represent plaintiff. Counsel is requested to confer with plaintiff, and discuss the viability and value of a Monell claim (given the pendency of case number 13-cv-8306). A status hearing is set for 12/8/15 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (psm, ) (Entered: 11/12/2015)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-07705_de9 AdministrativeID "11" @default.
- ilnd;;1:15-cv-07705_de9 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:15-cv-07705_de7 @default.