Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:16-cv-00513_de34> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-00513_de34 RegisterActionDate "2016-09-07" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-00513_de34 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss and strike, 19 , is denied. The class definition is redefined in accordance with this order. The Court also rejects Defendants' argument that Alpha Tech's motion for class certification should be denied as premature. Despite the Seventh Circuit's decision in Chapman v. First Index, Inc., 796 F.3d 783, 787 (7th Cir. 2015), which overruled the reasoning in Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 895 (7th Cir. 2011), requiring placeholder motions for class certification, the Supreme Court's decision in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez has revived the potential need for place holder motions in this circuit. 136 S. Ct. 663, 672 (2016) ("We need not, and do not, now decide whether the result would be different if a defendant deposits the full amount of the plaintiff's individual claim in an account payable to the plaintiff, and the court then enters judgment for the plaintiff in that amount."). Alpha Tech's motion for class certification is entered and continued until a more appropriate point in the proceedings. Status hearing set for 9/16/2016 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/7/2016:Mailed notice(srn, ) (Entered: 09/07/2016)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-00513_de34 AdministrativeID "33" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-00513_de34 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-00513_de20 @default.