Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:16-cv-01963_de739> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-01963_de739 RegisterActionDate "2020-11-30" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-01963_de739 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendants move to admit evidence of Defendant's guilt for crimes to which he has confessed, was charged, and was convicted 511 . In short, because their defense is that AFC55D8 is actually guilty of the murder of Trunko, any evidence of his guilt, whether known at the time of his arrest and conviction or not, should be admissible to show that he is actually guilty of the crime. If the case were solely that the officers lacked probable cause to arrest AFC55D8, evidence discovered later would certainly not be relevant. But here, evidence of his guilt that was obtained after his conviction is highly relevant to the Defendants' defense. See Par. v. City of Elkhart, Ind., 702 F.3d 997 (7th Cir. 2012)("In assessing the adequacy of the damages amount, the trial court itself recognized that Parish's guilt or innocence was a significant issue for the jury in determining the appropriate damage award, and that issue is not dependent on what information was available at the time of the original trial.") Plaintiff responds with a number of examples of what he believes the Defendants intend to present to the Jury. The Court cannot determine which incidents Defendants intend to use and will require them to set forth specific instances of evidence that demonstrates guilt at the December hearing in order for the Court to determine if those instances are relevant. Motion 511 is granted upon the condition set forth herein. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 11/30/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-01963_de739 AdministrativeID "739" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-01963_de739 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-01963_de511 @default.