Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 8 of
8
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 RegisterActionDate "2017-08-28" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Although this motion does not directly pertain to all Defendants, all of them should read this because it contains, at the entry's end, instructions on any future filings. Plaintiff 7C0F2BC motions 315 320 to consolidate or to reassign 17-cv-4286 to this Court's docket are denied. The assigned judge in 17-cv-4286 has dismissed that case, so there is no pending case to consolidate or reassign. To the extent that one of the motions 315 sought recusal, this is the fourth such motion, and is denied as frivolous (as were the others, see R. 291, R. 311). Motion number 318 is terminated as unnecessary; there is no need to file the Executive Committee's order on this docket, as the filing restriction applies only to cases filed after the order's entry. Plaintiff's extension motion 323 is granted in part and denied in part. The extension motion asserts that Plaintiff did not receive copies of Urban Partnership's motion 297 for costs and Kovitz Shifrin's motion for sanctions 287 . But the response deadline on those motions was set in R. 311 (07/21/2017), which also reset other response deadlines, which Plaintiff filed, see R. 312, 313, demonstrating that Plaintiff did receive that order. So if there genuinely were any problems with receipt of Urban's motion or Kovitz Shifrin's motion, then Plaintiff should have earlier discovered it and raised the issue. Indeed, the entry of 06/21/2017 noted the suspension of briefing on those motions, which was over two months ago. The assertions of non-receipt are not credible. Having said that, from now on, Defendants must also mail a copy of any of their filings to Plaintiff's address on the docket, as a supplement to the CM/ECF electronic service. Despite the improbability that Plaintiff did not receive the motions, Plaintiff's extension motion 323 to respond to Urban Partnership's motion 297 for costs and Kovitz Shifrin's motion for sanctions 287 is granted in part to 09/11/2017. Urban's reply and Kovitz Shifrin's reply are due by 09/25/2017. The status hearing of 09/21/2017 is reset to 10/16/2017 at 9:30 a.m. Emailed notice (slb, ) (Entered: 08/28/2017)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 AdministrativeID "325" @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de287 @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de298 @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de317 @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de322 @default.
- ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de327 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:16-cv-02432_de325 @default.