Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:17-cv-00101_de379> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-00101_de379 RegisterActionDate "2019-07-13" @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-00101_de379 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER ON REMAINING MOTIONS IN LIMINE signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/13/2019: In the accompanying order, the Court rules on the remaining motions in limine, but it still has to determine the question of bifurcation as between liability and damages. In addition, the Court does not know how its ruling on 320F56C motion in limine regarding evidence about Bernard 320F56C and other court proceedings will affect the anticipated length of the trial. At the final pretrial conference, 320F56C attorney claimed that if the Court allowed in evidence regarding Bernard 320F56C, the trial would take "weeks." But he did not say why or how this is so. In fairness, however, the Court did not call upon 320F56C counsel to explain. But at this point an explanation is necessary so that the Court can determine whether to start the trial as currently scheduled on July 16 or to move it to August 20 as discussed at the final pretrial conference. To make this determination, the Court orders 320F56C to submit a written proffer describing exactly what evidence (witnesses, subjects of testimony, exhibits), beyond what she otherwise would have offered, will now be offered as a result of the Court's ruling on her motion in limine. This proffer is to be filed by no later than 11:00 a.m. on Monday, July 15, 2019. It is be as detailed as reasonably necessary to enable the Court to assess the likely length of a bifurcated or a non-bifurcated trial. Counsel for all parties are to appear before the Court on July 15, 2019 at 12:30 p.m. At that time, the Court will have a short discussion with counsel regarding the anticipated length of trial and will determine whether to start the trial on July 16 or continue it to August 20. To be clear, it will not be sufficient for 320F56C to simply say in her proffer (or for defendants' counsel to say at the hearing on July 15) that one or the other choice is preferred. That is the Court's determination to make, and it will make it based on the contents of 320F56C proffer and the parties' comments at the July 15 hearing. (mk) (Entered: 07/13/2019)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-00101_de379 AdministrativeID "377" @default.
- ilnd;;1:17-cv-00101_de379 hasJudgeReference SJ000228 @default.