Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cr-00883_de7> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 3 of
3
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00883_de7 RegisterActionDate "2020-12-29" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00883_de7 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER as to 202B879: Initial Appearance/Arraignment proceeding held. Defendant Roberto Parades arrested on 12/29/2020, appeared by telephone in response to an Indictment dated 12/10/2020. The Court advised defendant of rights to appear in person and defendant waives rights to appear in person. Pursuant to CARES Act, this hearing was conducted by telephone. See generally, CARES Act, Pub. L. 116-136 § 15002(b)(1). Consistent with the Act, the defendant's consent was obtained and noted on the record. Id., §15002(b)(4). Defendant was advised of rights and the charges pending against Defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 5. The court finds the Defendant is able to understand his rights as they are reviewed. Attorney Seema Ahmad's oral motion for leave to file an appearance on behalf of Defendant is granted. Enter order appointing Seema Ahmad as counsel for defendant. The Government is not seeking detention. The Government and Defendant agree on certain conditions of release. Defendant signed a personal recognizance bond. Enter Order Setting Conditions of Release and Appearance bond. Defendant acknowledged receipt of the indictment, waives formal reading and entered a plea of not guilty to count (1) one in the indictment. 16.1 (A) Conference to be held by 1/19/2021. The matter is set for a status hearing before Judge Durkin on 2/10/2021 at 9:30 a.m. The Government's oral motion to unseal case is granted. Case order unsealed. The Government's oral motion to exclude time is granted. Enter excludable time from 12/29/2020 to and including 2/10/2021 in the interest of justice to allow both parties to continue the investigation and to prepare pretrial matters. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(A), (h)(7)(B)(iv), (X-T). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 5(f)(1), the court confirms the prosecutor's continuing obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, to disclose information favorable to the defendant that is material to guilt or punishment. Failure to disclose may result in various consequences, including but not limited to: exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, a mistrial, dismissal of charges, vacatur of a conviction or guilty plea, disciplinary action against the prosecution, and contempt proceedings. Signed by the Honorable M. David Weisman on 12/29/2020. Mailed notice. (bg, ) (Entered: 12/29/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cr-00883_de7 AdministrativeID "6" @default.