Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cv-05017_de7> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 3 of
3
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-05017_de7 RegisterActionDate "2020-08-28" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-05017_de7 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Plaintiffs Sugar Bliss, LLC and Sugar Bliss Palmer House, LLC are directed to file, by 9/11/20, an amended complaint setting forth an adequate factual basis for their assertion of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint does not include sufficient information in support of the amount in controversy. Under 28 U.S.C. 1332, the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000. Other than a conclusory statement that the amount in controversy is in excess of $75,000, the complaint alleges no basis to infer the amount in controversy, such as, for example, the policy amounts. Further, multiple plaintiffs may not aggregate claims in order to reach the amount in controversy. See Saskatchewan Mut. Ins. Co. v. CE Design, Ltd., 865 F.3d 537, 543 (7th Cir. 2017) ("[I]n ordinary diversity cases, 'the general rule is that the claims of multiple litigants cannot be aggregated to reach the jurisdictional amount in controversy.'")Mailed notice (air, ) (Entered: 08/28/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-05017_de7 AdministrativeID "7" @default.