Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/ilnd;;1:20-cv-07448_de7> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-07448_de7 RegisterActionDate "2020-12-18" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-07448_de7 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The parties are back. This Court previously presided over a short-lived case between the same parties involving the same claims under the same statute. See 11B823F v. MV Transportation, 20-cv-5375. This Court directed Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be transferred to the Central District of Illinois, given that the named plaintiff lived and worked in Peoria (in the Central District). See 11B823F v. MV Transportation, 20-cv-5375 (Dckt. No. 9). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss, too. In response, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case at 4:05 p.m. on November 17, 2020. See 11B823F v. MV Transportation, 20-cv-5375 (Dckt. No. 30). Plaintiff's change of heart was short lived. That same day, less than two hours later, Plaintiff refiled the case in the Circuit Court of Illinois, the same venue where she originally filed the first case (before removal). (Dckt. No. 1 -1) (showing a complaint filed at 5:35 p.m. on November 17, 2020). By December 30, 2020, Plaintiff shall file a statement that explains how this case is different than the last case, and explains why Plaintiff dismissed the last case and refiled in state court. Based on paragraph 28 of the complaint, it appears that Plaintiff is now attempting to exclude anyone covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiff must identify the differences by attaching a redline. Also, by December 30, 2020, Plaintiff shall show cause why she should not bear the expense of removing this dispute to federal court for the second time. Finally, by December 30, 2020, Plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be transferred to the Central District of Illinois. The complaint alleges that MVTI collected fingerprint data in seven locations in Illinois. Plaintiff must address how many of those locations are within the Northern District of Illinois, the Central District, and the Southern District. Based on the Court's preliminary review, it appears that Plaintiff's new complaint deleted paragraph 11 from the old complaint in 11B823F v. MV Transportation, 20-cv-5375, which confirmed her ties to Peoria (not Chicago): "From 2019 to 2020, Plaintiff worked at MVTI's location at 1030 Olympia Drive, Peoria IL 61615." Plaintiff's statement must address whether that sentence appears in the complaint in the new action, and if not, why not. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 12/18/2020)" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-07448_de7 AdministrativeID "7" @default.
- ilnd;;1:20-cv-07448_de7 hasReferenceToOtherEntry ilnd;;1:20-cv-07448_de0 @default.