Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/mad;;1:16-cv-10386_de233> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- mad;;1:16-cv-10386_de233 RegisterActionDate "2019-09-16" @default.
- mad;;1:16-cv-10386_de233 RegisterActionDescriptionText "District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.1. Defendants motion to seal (Doc. No. 216) is ALLOWED as unopposed.2. Plaintiffs' motion to compel (Doc. No. 223) is DENIED without prejudice because it fails to comply with Local Rule 37.1(b) and with the Court's specific instructions that all such discovery motions comply with that local rules. See Doc. No. 211 at 28:1-7. This is not the first time counsel for the Plaintiffs has disregarded the Court. Plaintiffs have until October 4, 2019 to file a motion to compel. The parties shall meet and confer prior to the filing of the motion. The motion shall comply with Local Rule 37.1(b).3. Defendants' motion to strike (Doc. No. 224) is DENIED.4. Defendants' motion for leave to file a reply (Doc. No. 229) is ALLOWED.Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Montes, Mariliz) (Entered: 09/16/2019)" @default.
- mad;;1:16-cv-10386_de233 AdministrativeID "234" @default.
- mad;;1:16-cv-10386_de233 hasJudgeReference SJ000642 @default.