Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/med;;1:16-cv-00095_de18> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 5 of
5
with 100 items per page.
- med;;1:16-cv-00095_de18 RegisterActionDate "2016-04-29" @default.
- med;;1:16-cv-00095_de18 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER denying 15 Motion for TRO; denying 15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. In her Motion for TRO and PI the Plaintiff appears to complain about and seek review of concluded state court matters. The Motion for TRO and PI are denied because the Plaintiff seeks a remedy that would effectively set aside final state court decisions. Wang v. New Hampshire Bd. of Registration in Med., 55 F.3d 698, 703 (1st Cir. 1995) (quoting Schneider v. Colegio de Abogados de P.R., 917 F.2d 620, 628 (1st Cir. 1990) (As to any concluded matters, the RookerFeldman doctrine precludes this Courts collateral review of the state courts decisions even if the state judgment is challenged as unconstitutional.). Moreover, the Plaintiff has not provided the court with any sworn testimony or record evidence that would suggest that this court should intervene in the final state court matter as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 65. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (MMB) (Entered: 04/29/2016)" @default.
- med;;1:16-cv-00095_de18 AdministrativeID "17" @default.
- med;;1:16-cv-00095_de18 hasJudgeReference SJ003791 @default.
- med;;1:16-cv-00095_de18 hasReferenceToOtherEntry med;;1:16-cv-00095_de16 @default.