Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/moed;;4:16-cv-00410_de51> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 4 of
4
with 100 items per page.
- moed;;4:16-cv-00410_de51 RegisterActionDate "2016-11-14" @default.
- moed;;4:16-cv-00410_de51 RegisterActionDescriptionText "MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants D4C67FB and D4C67FB, Bennett & Radloff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 19] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants 52096B5. and Beavers, 52096B5 & Calvert's motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 22] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, National Association's motion to dismiss is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 25] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, National Association, 26800F7, Unknown Employee and/or Unknown Employees of First Mid Illinois Bank & Trust, and 530006F motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 27] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants D86DD03, 95FF4DC, F1BBCB4, 7C4E8AB, C46EF1C, and 530006F as Executrix for the Estate of Paul C. 7C4E8AB or C67861E or 70E1D05 or F86D999 or 3C047B1 motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent the Court finds there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 29] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants D4C67FB and D4C67FB, Bennett & Radloff's motion for sanctions is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiffs are barred from filing any further pro se pleadings with this Court that relate to the foreclosure proceedings that took place in Illinois state court, without prior approval of this Court. [Doc. 37] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs 3C047B1nd F86D999 for "Motion to Request Leave of Court to Allow the Filing of the Response to All of the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss,'" which the Court construes as a motion for leave to file their over-length memorandum in response to defendants' motions to dismiss out of time, is GRANTED. [Doc. 35] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs 3C047B1nd F86D999 "Motion for Leave to File All Four Pro Se Plaintiffs' Joint Response," which the Court construes as a motion for leave to file a surresponse to the motion for sanctions, is DENIED. [Doc. 42] An appropriate Order of Dismissal will accompany this memorandum and order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/14/2016. (MRC) (Entered: 11/14/2016)" @default.
- moed;;4:16-cv-00410_de51 AdministrativeID "44" @default.
- moed;;4:16-cv-00410_de51 hasJudgeReference SJ002205 @default.