Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 6 of
6
with 100 items per page.
- nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399 RegisterActionDate "2020-09-11" @default.
- nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ORDER granting in part and denying in part 276 Motion to Seal Document ; granting 278 Motion to Seal Document. Thus, Plaintiff's request for permission to redact limited portions of Dkt. Nos. 220, 221-4, and 240, see Dkt. No. 278, is hereby granted. For the same reasons, the Court grants Defendants request for permission to redact limited portions of Dkt. Nos. 195-4; 198; 220; 221-1; and 240. As for the sealed document, Defendants' interest in their sensitive commercial information outweighs the value of this information to those monitoring the courts. See Dkt. No. 276 at 2-3 (providing justification for proposed sealing). Defendants' request to maintain Dkt. No. 226-6 under seal is therefore also granted. However, the Court denies Defendants' request to file their sealing application with redactions and to maintain Exhibits A-C under seal, see Dkt. No. 275. Defendants' requests do not comply with the Court's Individual Rules in Civil Cases. Pursuant to Rule 4.B, parties are instructed to file motions for approval of sealed or redacted filings "in public view" without "confidential information sought to be filed under seal." It further provides that supporting papers may be filed under seal or redacted "only to the extent necessary to safeguard information sought to be filed under seal." Defendants' sealing application does not comply with this Rule; instead, Defendants' sealing application includes myriad confidential information--information they now seek to redact, in contravention of Rule 4.B. Because Defendants' sealing application and attached exhibits do not comply with this Rule, Defendants' request to file their application with redactions and attached exhibits under seal is DENIED. The Court will, however, permit Defendants to re-file a sealing application after removing all confidential information. The Court hereby GRANTS the parties' motions to seal with respect to all proposed redactions and sealing of motion papers. No later than one week from the date of this Order, the parties shall file on the public docket all motion papers related to parties' motions for summary judgment and Plaintiff's motions to exclude expert testimony, with redactions as approved in this Order, except for those documents for which the Court approved continued sealing. At that time, the parties shall also file unredacted copies of all documents redacted or under seal on ECF. The Court DENIES Defendants' request to file their sealing application with redactions and that Exhibits A-C to their application be maintained under seal. Within one week of the date of this Order, Defendants shall refile their motion to seal without any confidential information sought to be filed under seal. To the extent they seek sealing of supporting papers, they shall explain why such sealing is necessary to safeguard information sought to be filed under seal. This Order resolves Dkt. Nos. 276 and 278. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/11/2020) (mml) (Entered: 09/11/2020)" @default.
- nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399 AdministrativeID "373" @default.
- nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399 hasJudgeReference SJ000746 @default.
- nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399 hasReferenceToOtherEntry nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de296 @default.
- nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de399 hasReferenceToOtherEntry nysd;;1:17-cv-03086_de298 @default.