Matches in SCALES for { <scales/DocketEntry/txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 7 of
7
with 100 items per page.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 RegisterActionDate "2020-12-15" @default.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 RegisterActionDescriptionText "ELECTRONIC ORDER: On this date, the City filed objections 34 to the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order denying the Citys Motion for Summary Judgment 32 . The City appears to construe the Courts Memorandum Opinion and Order as proposed findings and recommendations under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) to which the City was entitled to object under that statute and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The Court notes that, through their Joint Proposal for Contents of Scheduling and Discovery Order 14 , the parties consented to the magistrate judge exercising the full jurisdiction of the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Nevertheless, the Court construes the Citys objections liberally as a motion for the Court to reconsider its Memorandum Opinion and Order, and DENIES that motion. To the extent not otherwise disposed of, the Citys objections are overruled. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge John R. Parker on 12/15/2020) (Magistrate Judge John R. Parker) (Entered: 12/15/2020)" @default.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 AdministrativeID "37" @default.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 hasJudgeReference SJ003139 @default.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 hasReferenceToOtherEntry txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de14 @default.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 hasReferenceToOtherEntry txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de32 @default.
- txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de37 hasReferenceToOtherEntry txnd;;1:17-cv-00160_de34 @default.