FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1984927391> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1984927391 endingPage "474" @default.
• W1984927391 startingPage "451" @default.
• W1984927391 abstract "Time and History in Alois Riegl's Theory of Perception Michael Gubser In an early essay, the Austrian art historian Alois Riegl (1858–1905), a pioneer of the modern discipline of art history, linked the creation of the zodiac images in calendar art to the designation of constellations in the heavens.1 Ancient calendar artists observed the motion of stars across the night sky and attempted to map them into recognizable patterns representing specific temporal periods. Their efforts inscribed the cyclical temporality of the heavens into the images of the ancient calendar. This inherent temporality came to characterize all art forms in Riegl's work; his choice of calendar art as his earliest research topic heralded a career-long interest in the connection between temporality and artistic form. Art objects, he believed, were temporal as well as spatial. Just as the light from constellations reflected a deep history, artworks illuminated the passage of time by visually re-presenting the perceptual world of past eras. Riegl's work has garnered attention in recent decades among art historians and non–art historians alike. This interest is due in part to the renewed concern for disciplinary origins that art history, like other fields, has experienced in the wake of poststructuralist critiques. Scholars outside of art history have taken note of his work because of its broad scope and relevance for the study of historiography and perception; Riegl's work provides models for linking the analysis of specific artworks with a history of perception, exploring the relationship between monuments and memory, and analyzing the nature of visual modernity. Interest in Riegl also stems from his acknowledged impact on such preeminent philosophers and historical theorists as Erwin Panofsky, Paul Feyerabend, Gilles Deleuze, Fèlix Guattari, and above all Walter [End Page 451] Benjamin.2 Figures as varied as Georg Lukács, Karl Mannheim, Walter Gropius, and Mikhail Bakhtin have cited his work favorably.3 Riegl is perhaps best known for his attempts to dismantle the hierarchy of high and low art, his attack on the preeminence of classical aesthetic ideals, and his effort to construct a universal history of style. The combination of these commitments led him to consider European and non-European craft genres that fell outside conventional definitions of art. In books such as Problems of Style, Late Roman Art Industry, and The Group Portraiture of Holland, Riegl examined the high arts, decorative arts, and manufactured artifacts alike, gleaning insights into the structure of an era's perception from close descriptive analyses of its artwork.4 In Problems of Style, Riegl traced the development of ancient vegetal decorative motifs toward their fulfillment in the naturalized tendrils and acanthus leaves of Greek ornament. A single, universal development encompassed seemingly distinct motivic forms, and creative innovation was driven by an inner formal logic. Similarly, Late Roman Art Industry, the [End Page 452] epoch-making work that Walter Benjamin described as a revolution in art historical method,5 traced the gradual development of space as an object of artistic concern in the late Roman Empire. In this volume, Riegl explored his controversial notion of the Kunstwollen, or artistic will, which asserted art's autonomy on the basis of a formal creative volition internal to artworks.6 Finally, The Group Portraiture of Holland documented the emergence and decline of a typically Hollandish painting emphasizing space and attention.7 Riegl scholars have frequently attempted to situate his art history within a variety of philosophical traditions, an effort complicated by Riegl's limited citation of sources. Several scholars have linked Riegl's historical vision with the embattled tradition of Hegelian philosophy. Riegl's teleology; his stress on the unified, internal, and purposive development of art; his notion of art as mind overcoming material; and even his emphasis on the role of the viewer in art all have a distinctly Hegelian resonance. Wolfgang Kemp fits Riegl squarely within a late-nineteenth-century Hegelian revival,8 Michael Podro incorporates him within a Hegelian critical tradition of art history that spanned the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,9 and Michael Ann Holly posits a clear trajectory, linking Kant and Hegel with Riegl and Panofsky.10 Others, however, just as firmly reject this..." @default.
• W1984927391 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1984927391 creator A5088065972 @default.
• W1984927391 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W1984927391 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1984927391 title "Time and History in Alois Riegl's Theory of Perception" @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1498031951 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1501882709 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1523373659 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1536052866 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1538665019 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1544182671 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1551856080 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1586437107 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1610161198 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1664990607 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W1999140826 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2014673109 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2025372805 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2027427904 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2045876620 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2056879345 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2317319351 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W2796044535 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W3021330876 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W313071435 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W319918596 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W354018668 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W435151005 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W560221547 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W578927330 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W582024361 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W586911026 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W599290340 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W607024017 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W618722776 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W626107461 @default.
• W1984927391 cites W634516162 @default.
• W1984927391 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2005.0044" @default.
• W1984927391 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1984927391 type Work @default.
• W1984927391 sameAs 1984927391 @default.
• W1984927391 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W1984927391 countsByYear W19849273912012 @default.
• W1984927391 countsByYear W19849273912016 @default.
• W1984927391 countsByYear W19849273912017 @default.
• W1984927391 countsByYear W19849273912019 @default.
• W1984927391 countsByYear W19849273912022 @default.
• W1984927391 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1984927391 hasAuthorship W1984927391A5088065972 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C123657996 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C131419983 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C141679102 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C204457725 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C2779867537 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C107038049 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C111472728 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C123657996 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C131419983 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C138885662 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C141679102 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C142362112 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C151730666 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C153349607 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C166957645 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C204457725 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C2779867537 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C29598333 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C52119013 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C86803240 @default.
• W1984927391 hasConceptScore W1984927391C95457728 @default.
• W1984927391 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1984927391 hasLocation W19849273911 @default.
• W1984927391 hasOpenAccess W1984927391 @default.
• W1984927391 hasPrimaryLocation W19849273911 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W1490341056 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W1563552375 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W1984927391 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W2042652687 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W2225771774 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W2342149092 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W2357147749 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W2517428132 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W3190196110 @default.
• W1984927391 hasRelatedWork W579956172 @default.
• W1984927391 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W1984927391 isParatext "false" @default.

• next