FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016269925> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016269925 abstract "Abstract Background Low back pain in pregnancy is common and research evidence on the response to chiropractic treatment is limited. The purposes of this study are 1) to report outcomes in pregnant patients receiving chiropractic treatment; 2) to compare outcomes from subgroups; 3) to assess predictors of outcome. Methods Pregnant patients with low back or pelvic pain, no contraindications to manipulative therapy and no manual therapy in the prior 3 months were recruited. Baseline numerical rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry questionnaire data were collected. Duration of complaint, number of previous LBP episodes, LBP during a previous pregnancy, and category of pain location were recorded. The patient’s global impression of change (PGIC) (primary outcome), NRS, and Oswestry data (secondary outcomes) were collected at 1 week, 1 and 3 months after the first treatment. At 6 months and 1 year the PGIC and NRS scores were collected. PGIC responses of ‘better’ or ‘much better’ were categorized as ‘improved’. The proportion of patients ‘improved’ at each time point was calculated. Chi-squared test compared subgroups with ‘improvement’. Baseline and follow-up NRS and Oswestry scores were compared using the paired t-test. The unpaired t-test compared NRS and Oswestry scores in patients with and without a history of LBP and with and without LBP during a previous pregnancy. Anova compared baseline and follow-up NRS and Oswestry scores by pain location category and category of number of previous LBP episodes. Logistic regression analysis also was also performed. Results 52% of 115 recruited patients ‘improved’ at 1 week, 70% at 1 month, 85% at 3 months, 90% at 6 months and 88% at 1 year. There were significant reductions in NRS and Oswestry scores (p < 0.0005). Category of previous LBP episodes number at one year (p = 0.02) was related to ,improvement’ when analyzed alone, but was not strongly predictive in logistic regression. Patients with more prior LBP episodes had higher 1 year NRS scores (p = 0.013). Conclusions Most pregnant patients undergoing chiropractic treatment reported clinically relevant improvement at all time points. No single variable was strongly predictive of, improvement’ in the logistic regression model." @default.
• W2016269925 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016269925 creator A5027033758 @default.
• W2016269925 creator A5065904507 @default.
• W2016269925 creator A5070278044 @default.
• W2016269925 date "2014-04-01" @default.
• W2016269925 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2016269925 title "Outcomes of pregnant patients with low back pain undergoing chiropractic treatment: a prospective cohort study with short term, medium term and 1 year follow-up" @default.
• W2016269925 cites W1970379462 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W1973339378 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W1999981676 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2007676305 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2010055769 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2015221975 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2017768132 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2025476407 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2028057728 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2052254470 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2055502372 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2056342745 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2066412921 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2080058683 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2085368557 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2094577632 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2102795630 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2112626728 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2130814586 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2154045432 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2158925146 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2166890438 @default.
• W2016269925 cites W2167225740 @default.
• W2016269925 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-709x-22-15" @default.
• W2016269925 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3994225" @default.
• W2016269925 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24690125" @default.
• W2016269925 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2016269925 type Work @default.
• W2016269925 sameAs 2016269925 @default.
• W2016269925 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252014 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252015 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252016 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252017 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252018 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252019 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252020 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252021 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252022 @default.
• W2016269925 countsByYear W20162699252023 @default.
• W2016269925 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016269925 hasAuthorship W2016269925A5027033758 @default.
• W2016269925 hasAuthorship W2016269925A5065904507 @default.
• W2016269925 hasAuthorship W2016269925A5070278044 @default.
• W2016269925 hasBestOaLocation W20162699251 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C2775998654 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C2779470654 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C514863369 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C516994506 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C126322002 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C141071460 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C142724271 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C151956035 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C1862650 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C188816634 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C201903717 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C204787440 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C2775998654 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C2776501849 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C2779234561 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C2779470654 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C2780907711 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C514863369 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C516994506 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C54355233 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C71924100 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C72563966 @default.
• W2016269925 hasConceptScore W2016269925C86803240 @default.
• W2016269925 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2016269925 hasLocation W20162699251 @default.
• W2016269925 hasLocation W20162699252 @default.
• W2016269925 hasLocation W20162699253 @default.
• W2016269925 hasLocation W20162699254 @default.
• W2016269925 hasLocation W20162699255 @default.
• W2016269925 hasOpenAccess W2016269925 @default.
• W2016269925 hasPrimaryLocation W20162699251 @default.
• W2016269925 hasRelatedWork W2007606659 @default.

• next