Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2028103650> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2028103650 endingPage "597" @default.
- W2028103650 startingPage "581" @default.
- W2028103650 abstract "Abstract The objective of this research was to determine shoulder girdle fatigue for different combinations of weight of workpieces, weight of hand-tools, shoulder postures, arm up time and arm down time that are commonly used in automotive assembly operations. Both objective [surface electromyography (sEMG)] and subjective measures (ratings of perceived exertion, (RPE), fatigue and pain) were used to assess stress, fatigue and pain in the shoulder girdle. Ten healthy young female subjects participated in a laboratory experiment that consisted of a simulation of common automotive assembly job tasks. The simulation consisted of four tasks in a 1-min job-cycle. Each cycle was repeated 50 times. The four tasks were varied with different predetermined combinations of two weights ( W 1 signifying a workpiece and W 2 signifying the hand-tool weight), three exertion times and three shoulder postures. W 1 was either 1.36 or 2.73 kg (3 and 6 lb), and W 2 was 0.45, 0.91 or 1.82 kg (1, 2 and 4 lb). Exertion time was with the arm up for 2 seconds and down for 2 s (2–2) for ten exertions per minute, arm 3 s up and 3 s down (3–3) for seven exertions/min, or arm 5 s up and 3 s down (5–3) for five exertions/min. Each cycle finished with an 8–10 s rest phase to complete a 1-min cycle time. The posture angles were shoulder flexion of 60°, 90° and 120° combined with an included elbow angle of 90°, 120° and 150°, respectively. Experimental combinations ( n =54) were randomly selected. Response variables were recorded in the first minute and every 5 min thereafter for 50 min. The response variables included sEMG, RPE, fatigue and pain in the shoulder girdle. All subjects were able to perform all combinations with the lowest weights; however, in the more extreme postures, a few subjects prematurely terminated the experiments due to fatigue and/or pain. RPEs, as compared to sEMG data, appeared more sensitive and consistent. An analysis of variance showed that all four variables (workpiece weight ( W 1 ), tool weight ( W 2 ), arm up and down time, exertion time and shoulder posture) were statistically significant ( p ⩽0.01), although the tool weight and workpiece weight were most predictive of capabilities. As expected, the RPE, fatigue and pain increased with an increase in the weights of the workpiece ( W 1 ) and hand tool ( W 2 ). Guidelines for acceptable workloads are provided. Relevance to Industry Combinations of weights, exertion time and shoulder posture that cause excessive fatigue are important for designing overhead work and hand-tools. The data reported provide a set of such data for female subjects." @default.
- W2028103650 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2028103650 creator A5021491784 @default.
- W2028103650 creator A5073028184 @default.
- W2028103650 creator A5082237486 @default.
- W2028103650 date "2006-06-01" @default.
- W2028103650 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W2028103650 title "Short-cycle overhead work and shoulder girdle muscle fatigue" @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1610875234 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1738415516 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1965123981 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1970476480 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1972648294 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1973196862 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1973363104 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1974202312 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1974308734 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1975361070 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1977666016 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1977764948 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1979871438 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1981184861 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1991997782 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1995489260 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1997098210 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1997185759 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W1997853408 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2001527442 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2003770727 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2004008756 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2006891496 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2007523936 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2014362088 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2023567046 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2024576943 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2026822421 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2029435222 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2030683559 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2031363457 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2034564511 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2035683078 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2040883003 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2041882969 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2042586257 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2043679763 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2045537334 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2052425837 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2057503473 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2060014200 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2063855580 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2070916663 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2071742477 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2072210689 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2078050142 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2082688798 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2083846939 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2087045244 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2089528911 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2092310032 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2095369732 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2096935943 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2102783455 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2103991183 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2105963263 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2107310259 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2111443530 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2133016805 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2139696792 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2140242474 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2145050579 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2148873179 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2205751261 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2326406159 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W2335237841 @default.
- W2028103650 cites W4243434541 @default.
- W2028103650 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2006.02.002" @default.
- W2028103650 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2028103650 type Work @default.
- W2028103650 sameAs 2028103650 @default.
- W2028103650 citedByCount "52" @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502012 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502013 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502014 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502015 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502016 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502017 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502018 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502019 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502020 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502021 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502022 @default.
- W2028103650 countsByYear W20281036502023 @default.
- W2028103650 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2028103650 hasAuthorship W2028103650A5021491784 @default.
- W2028103650 hasAuthorship W2028103650A5073028184 @default.
- W2028103650 hasAuthorship W2028103650A5082237486 @default.
- W2028103650 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2028103650 hasConcept C119599485 @default.