FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2036702384> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2036702384 endingPage "3349" @default.
• W2036702384 startingPage "3338" @default.
• W2036702384 abstract "To determine the role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with conventional radiography in the detection of chronic and acute inflammatory manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the shoulder joint.Forty-three consecutive patients with known RA prospectively underwent clinical examination, radiography, ultrasound, and MRI of the shoulder joints. Each patient was assigned a clinical/laboratory score consisting of 7 parameters, including measurements of shoulder mobility, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein level. Conventional radiography was standardized and performed in 2 planes. Ultrasound was performed in 10 predefined planes using a 7.5-MHz linear transducer. MRI at 1.5T comprised transverse and oblique coronal T1- and T2*-weighted fast spin-echo, gradient-echo (GRE), and inversion-recovery sequences with a matrix size of up to 512 pixels. A dynamic T1-weighted GRE sequence was acquired with intravenous administration of contrast medium. Erosions were assessed using all 3 imaging techniques on a 4-point scale. Soft-tissue involvement was evaluated according to the presence of synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bursitis on ultrasound and MRI. The results in the study group were compared with those obtained in a control group of 10 patients with shoulder pain.In the study group, erosions of the humeroscapular joint were detected by conventional radiography in 26 patients, by ultrasound in 30 patients, and by MRI in 39 patients; the differences were statistically significant for the comparisons of conventional radiography with MRI and for ultrasound versus MRI (P < 0.0001). Conventional radiography detected 12 erosions of the scapula and MRI detected 15. Synovitis was demonstrated in 12 patients by ultrasound and in 27 patients by MRI (P = 0.0003). Tenosynovitis was observed in 15 patients by ultrasound and in 28 patients by MRI (P = 0.0064). Bursitis was detected in 13 patients by ultrasound and in 18 patients by MRI. The findings on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI correlated significantly with the detection of synovitis by ultrasound and erosions by static MRI (P < 0.05).Ultrasound and MRI supplement conventional radiography in assessing the shoulder joint. Although conventional radiography can be used as the sole method of following up known joint destruction in RA, ultrasound and, preferably, MRI are recommended as additional techniques in the initial diagnostic evaluation when radiography yields negative results." @default.
• W2036702384 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5009974636 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5014093775 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5027563180 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5032192131 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5036865032 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5040140293 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5054910144 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5059253775 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5077033598 @default.
• W2036702384 creator A5088179796 @default.
• W2036702384 date "2003-12-01" @default.
• W2036702384 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2036702384 title "Rheumatoid arthritis of the shoulder joint: Comparison of conventional radiography, ultrasound, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging" @default.
• W2036702384 cites W1965066261 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W1988173800 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W1990767251 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2001233853 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2002876850 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2005355143 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2015473943 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2020299225 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2020674840 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2024251533 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2051471796 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2051862426 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2053086289 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2054756566 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2056910790 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2070668050 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2073711090 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2076061140 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2091210479 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2092914932 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2098802712 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2103048212 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2104208528 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2110145549 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2116605882 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2123445076 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2127811035 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2135589265 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2148863742 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2152348310 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W2206746226 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W4242155593 @default.
• W2036702384 cites W4255140970 @default.
• W2036702384 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11349" @default.
• W2036702384 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14673985" @default.
• W2036702384 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2036702384 type Work @default.
• W2036702384 sameAs 2036702384 @default.
• W2036702384 citedByCount "105" @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842012 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842013 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842014 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842015 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842016 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842017 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842018 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842019 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842020 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842021 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842022 @default.
• W2036702384 countsByYear W20367023842023 @default.
• W2036702384 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5009974636 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5014093775 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5027563180 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5032192131 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5036865032 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5040140293 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5054910144 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5059253775 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5077033598 @default.
• W2036702384 hasAuthorship W2036702384A5088179796 @default.
• W2036702384 hasBestOaLocation W20367023841 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C2776751720 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C2777575956 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C2779244835 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C2780062341 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C2780457017 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConceptScore W2036702384C126322002 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConceptScore W2036702384C126838900 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConceptScore W2036702384C13483470 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConceptScore W2036702384C141071460 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConceptScore W2036702384C143409427 @default.
• W2036702384 hasConceptScore W2036702384C143753070 @default.

• next