FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2409632912> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2409632912 endingPage "85" @default.
• W2409632912 startingPage "77" @default.
• W2409632912 abstract "Reductions in livestock antimicrobial use (AMU) can be achieved through identification of effective antimicrobial alternatives as well as accurate and stringent identification of cases requiring antimicrobial therapy. Objective measurements of selectivity that incorporate appropriate case definitions are necessary to understand the need and potential for reductions in AMU through judicious use. The objective of this study was to measure selectivity using a novel disease severity treatment threshold for calf diarrhea, and identify predictors of more selective application of antimicrobials among conventional dairy producers. A second objective of this study was to describe the usage frequency and perceptions of efficacy of common antimicrobial alternatives among conventional and organic producers. The cross-sectional survey was mailed to Michigan and Ohio, USA dairy producers and contained questions on AMU attitudes, AMU practices, veterinary-written protocols, and antimicrobial alternatives. The treatment threshold, defined based on the case severity where the producer would normally apply antimicrobials, was identified with a series of descriptions with increasing severity, and ordinal multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between the treatment threshold and individual or herd characteristics. The response rate was 49% (727/1488). Overall, 42% of conventional producers reported any veterinary-written treatment protocol, and 27% (113/412) of conventional producers had a veterinary-written protocol for the treatment of diarrhea that included a case identification. The majority (58%, 253/437) of conventional producers, but a minority (7%) of organic producers disagreed that antibiotic use in agriculture led to resistant bacterial infections in people. Among conventional producers, the proportion of producers applying antimicrobials for therapy increased from 13% to 67% with increasing case severity. The treatment threshold was low, medium, and high for 11% (47/419), 57% (251/419), and 28% (121/419) of conventional producers, respectively. Treatment threshold was not significantly associated with the use of protocols or frequency of veterinary visits; however, individuals with more concern for the public health impact of livestock AMU had a significantly higher treatment threshold (i.e. more selective) (p < 0.05). Alternative therapies were used by both organic and conventional producers, but, garlic, aloe, and “other herbal therapies” with little documented efficacy were used by a majority (>60%) of organic producers. Overall, findings from this study highlight the need for research on antimicrobial alternatives, wider application of treatment protocols, and farm personnel education and training on diagnostic criteria for initiation of antimicrobial therapy." @default.
• W2409632912 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2409632912 creator A5000027148 @default.
• W2409632912 creator A5023831462 @default.
• W2409632912 creator A5070041966 @default.
• W2409632912 creator A5091703136 @default.
• W2409632912 date "2016-08-01" @default.
• W2409632912 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2409632912 title "Understanding antimicrobial stewardship: Disease severity treatment thresholds and antimicrobial alternatives among organic and conventional calf producers" @default.
• W2409632912 cites W1887840243 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W1971282977 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W1979583534 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2017090572 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2024547860 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2037497066 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2040103101 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2054032956 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2066802391 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2097982471 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2104133641 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2131726675 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W2152981818 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W4249835627 @default.
• W2409632912 cites W602810398 @default.
• W2409632912 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.004" @default.
• W2409632912 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27435649" @default.
• W2409632912 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2409632912 type Work @default.
• W2409632912 sameAs 2409632912 @default.
• W2409632912 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122017 @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122018 @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122019 @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122020 @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122021 @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122022 @default.
• W2409632912 countsByYear W24096329122023 @default.
• W2409632912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2409632912 hasAuthorship W2409632912A5000027148 @default.
• W2409632912 hasAuthorship W2409632912A5023831462 @default.
• W2409632912 hasAuthorship W2409632912A5070041966 @default.
• W2409632912 hasAuthorship W2409632912A5091703136 @default.
• W2409632912 hasBestOaLocation W24096329121 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C112964050 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C118817206 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C150903083 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C2776040555 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C2779802037 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C42972112 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C4937899 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C94665300 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C112964050 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C116834253 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C118518473 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C118817206 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C126322002 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C144133560 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C150903083 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C151956035 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C18903297 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C2776040555 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C2779802037 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C42972112 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C4937899 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C501593827 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C59822182 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C71924100 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C86803240 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C89423630 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C94665300 @default.
• W2409632912 hasConceptScore W2409632912C99454951 @default.
• W2409632912 hasFunder F4320332299 @default.
• W2409632912 hasLocation W24096329121 @default.
• W2409632912 hasLocation W24096329122 @default.
• W2409632912 hasOpenAccess W2409632912 @default.
• W2409632912 hasPrimaryLocation W24096329121 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W1482781377 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W1514037761 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W2075989176 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W2096680952 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W2350789819 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W2606702867 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W3088515810 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W3123477426 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W4315647785 @default.
• W2409632912 hasRelatedWork W4361275215 @default.

• next