FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3048837552> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3048837552 endingPage "e9687" @default.
• W3048837552 startingPage "e9687" @default.
• W3048837552 abstract "Elbow and wrist chronic conditions are very common among musculoskeletal problems. These painful conditions affect muscle function, which ultimately leads to a decrease in the joint's Range Of Motion (ROM). Due to their portability and ease of use, goniometers are still the most widespread tool for measuring ROM. Inertial sensors are emerging as a digital, low-cost and accurate alternative. However, whereas inertial sensors are commonly used in research studies, due to the lack of information about their validity and reliability, they are not widely used in the clinical practice. The goal of this study is to assess the validity and intra-inter-rater reliability of inertial sensors for measuring active ROM of the elbow and wrist.Measures were taken simultaneously with inertial sensors (Werium™ system) and a universal goniometer. The process involved two physiotherapists (rater A and rater B) and an engineer responsible for the technical issues. Twenty-nine asymptomatic subjects were assessed individually in two sessions separated by 48 h. The procedure was repeated by rater A followed by rater B with random order. Three repetitions of each active movement (elbow flexion, pronation, and supination; and wrist flexion, extension, radial deviation and ulnar deviation) were executed starting from the neutral position until the ROM end-feel; that is, until ROM reached its maximum due to be stopped by the anatomy. The coefficient of determination (r2) and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. The Standard Error of the Measurement and the Minimum Detectable Change and a Bland-Altman plots were also calculated.Similar ROM values when measured with both instruments were obtained for the elbow (maximum difference of 3° for all the movements) and wrist (maximum difference of 1° for all the movements). These values were within the normal range when compared to literature studies. The concurrent validity analysis for all the movements yielded ICC values ≥0.78 for the elbow and ≥0.95 for the wrist. Concerning reliability, the ICC values denoted a high reliability of inertial sensors for all the different movements. In the case of the elbow, intra-rater and inter-rater reliability ICC values range from 0.83 to 0.96 and from 0.94 to 0.97, respectively. Intra-rater analysis of the wrist yielded ICC values between 0.81 and 0.93, while the ICC values for the inter-rater analysis range from 0.93 to 0.99.Inertial sensors are a valid and reliable tool for measuring elbow and wrist active ROM. Particularly noteworthy is their high inter-rater reliability, often questioned in measurement tools. The lowest reliability is observed in elbow prono-supination, probably due to skin artifacts. Based on these results and their advantages, inertial sensors can be considered a valid assessment tool for wrist and elbow ROM." @default.
• W3048837552 created "2020-08-18" @default.
• W3048837552 creator A5009559848 @default.
• W3048837552 creator A5023497206 @default.
• W3048837552 creator A5054078394 @default.
• W3048837552 creator A5057826637 @default.
• W3048837552 creator A5058386978 @default.
• W3048837552 creator A5066139735 @default.
• W3048837552 date "2020-08-11" @default.
• W3048837552 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3048837552 title "Validity and reliability of inertial sensors for elbow and wrist range of motion assessment" @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1488033917 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1500163079 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1922411293 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1952647236 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1966469998 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1993722932 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W1998726526 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2012447647 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2053349439 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2062633387 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2086194538 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2131748372 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2135676962 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2154467309 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2155739747 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2161201723 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2194747189 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2207716251 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2275744032 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2331577291 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2343519821 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2460830751 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2473495655 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2520121748 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2557475536 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2567592426 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2618272117 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2766085369 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2793667086 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2886128062 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2888994960 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2892013739 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2911740268 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2911878044 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2912654919 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W2949077135 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W3003795847 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W4233113463 @default.
• W3048837552 cites W644059771 @default.
• W3048837552 doi "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9687" @default.
• W3048837552 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7427560" @default.
• W3048837552 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32864213" @default.
• W3048837552 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3048837552 type Work @default.
• W3048837552 sameAs 3048837552 @default.
• W3048837552 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W3048837552 countsByYear W30488375522020 @default.
• W3048837552 countsByYear W30488375522021 @default.
• W3048837552 countsByYear W30488375522022 @default.
• W3048837552 countsByYear W30488375522023 @default.
• W3048837552 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3048837552 hasAuthorship W3048837552A5009559848 @default.
• W3048837552 hasAuthorship W3048837552A5023497206 @default.
• W3048837552 hasAuthorship W3048837552A5054078394 @default.
• W3048837552 hasAuthorship W3048837552A5057826637 @default.
• W3048837552 hasAuthorship W3048837552A5058386978 @default.
• W3048837552 hasAuthorship W3048837552A5066139735 @default.
• W3048837552 hasBestOaLocation W30488375521 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C2780021535 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C48806519 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C79061980 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C89805583 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConceptScore W3048837552C104709138 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConceptScore W3048837552C105795698 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConceptScore W3048837552C111919701 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConceptScore W3048837552C121332964 @default.
• W3048837552 hasConceptScore W3048837552C141071460 @default.

• next