FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3106842954> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3106842954 endingPage "91" @default.
• W3106842954 startingPage "85" @default.
• W3106842954 abstract "Objective Endometrial cancer surgical staging includes lymph node assessment which can lead to lower extremity lymphedema. The aim of this study was to estimate prevalence after sentinel lymph node biopsy versus lymphadenectomy. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, between January 2009 and June 2016 for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer were mailed our validated 13 item lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire. We also ascertained via questionnaire whether the patient was ever diagnosed with lower extremity lymphedema. Results Among 378 patients included in the analysis, 127 (33.5%) had sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without side specific lymphadenectomy (sentinel lymph node cohort) and 251 (66.4%) underwent bilateral lymphadenectomy prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy implementation at our institution or as 'backup' after sentinel lymph node mapping (lymphadenectomy cohort). The prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema was 41.5% (157/378), with 69 patients (18.3%) self-reporting a lower extremity lymphedema diagnosis after their endometrial cancer surgery at a median of 54.3 months (interquartile range 31.2–70.1 months), and an additional 88 patients (23.3%) identified by the screening questionnaire. The prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema was significantly higher in the lymphadenectomy cohort compared with the sentinel lymph node group (49.4% (124/251) vs 26.0% (33/127); p<0.001). When the cohorts were restricted to patients surgically managed after the introduction of sentinel lymph node, the prevalence of lower extremity lymphedema was still significantly higher in the lymphadenectomy cohort compared with the sentinel lymph node cohort (39.0% (41/105) vs 26.0% (33/127); p=0.03). In a multivariable analysis adjusted for body mass index, receipt of adjuvant external beam radiation, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade, the adjusted odds ratio for the association between type of nodal sampling (lymphadenectomy cohort vs sentinel lymph node cohort) and lower extremity lymphedema was 2.75 (95% confidence interval 1.69 to 4.47, p<0.001). Conclusions Sentinel lymph node biopsy was associated with a decreased risk of post-treatment lymphedema compared with lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma." @default.
• W3106842954 created "2020-12-07" @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5010282758 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5033971645 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5037262464 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5037825413 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5041306590 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5043789773 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5052515933 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5066146057 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5066984248 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5075505395 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5077315571 @default.
• W3106842954 creator A5089254242 @default.
• W3106842954 date "2020-11-26" @default.
• W3106842954 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3106842954 title "Reduced lymphedema after sentinel lymph node biopsy versus lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer" @default.
• W3106842954 cites W1966972930 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W1983946784 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W1985369660 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2007215762 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2041450316 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2052955923 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2099804445 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2128772530 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2130232389 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2147585810 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2166074462 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2200250107 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2220304099 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2334862741 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2583455670 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2593740182 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2615584788 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2755052350 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2778695944 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2810117508 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2810382496 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2909496144 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2911188335 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2921934697 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2967906378 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2979676587 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2982428211 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W2990076002 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W337301966 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W4230182970 @default.
• W3106842954 cites W4249776053 @default.
• W3106842954 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001924" @default.
• W3106842954 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33243776" @default.
• W3106842954 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3106842954 type Work @default.
• W3106842954 sameAs 3106842954 @default.
• W3106842954 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W3106842954 countsByYear W31068429542021 @default.
• W3106842954 countsByYear W31068429542022 @default.
• W3106842954 countsByYear W31068429542023 @default.
• W3106842954 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5010282758 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5033971645 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5037262464 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5037825413 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5041306590 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5043789773 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5052515933 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5066146057 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5066984248 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5075505395 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5077315571 @default.
• W3106842954 hasAuthorship W3106842954A5089254242 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C179671157 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C2777088508 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C2780212769 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C2781392513 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C121608353 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C126322002 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C126838900 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C141071460 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C179671157 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C2775934546 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C2777088508 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C2780212769 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C2780824555 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C2780849966 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C2781392513 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C530470458 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C71924100 @default.
• W3106842954 hasConceptScore W3106842954C72563966 @default.

• next