FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3120406064> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3120406064 abstract "Abstract Background Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is increasingly being used in the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI). Health economic evaluations may support decision-making regarding the implementation of FMT in clinical practice. Previous reviews have highlighted several methodological concerns in published health economic evaluations examining FMT. However, the impact of these concerns on the conclusions of the studies remains unclear. Aims To present an overview and assess the methodological quality of health economic evaluations that compare FMT with antibiotics for treatment of rCDI. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the degree to which any methodological concerns would affect conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of FMT. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review based on a search in seven medical databases up to 16 July 2020. We included research articles reporting on full health economic evaluations comparing FMT with antibiotic treatment for rCDI. General study characteristics and input estimates for costs, effectiveness and utilities were extracted from the articles. The quality of the studies was assessed by two authors using the Drummonds ten-point checklist. Results We identified seven cost-utility analyses. All studies applied decision-analytic modelling and compared various FMT delivery methods with vancomycin, fidaxomicin, metronidazole or a combination of vancomycin and bezlotoxumab. The time horizons used in the analyses varied from 78 days to lifelong, and the perspectives differed between a societal, a healthcare system or a third-party payer perspective. The applied willingness-to-pay threshold ranged from 20,000 to 68,000 Great Britain pound sterling (GBP) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). FMT was considered the most cost-effective alternative in all studies. In five of the health economic evaluations, FMT was both more effective and cost saving than antibiotic treatment alternatives. The quality of the articles varied, and we identified several methodological concerns. Conclusions Economic evaluations consistently reported that FMT is a cost-effective and potentially cost-saving treatment for rCDI. Based on a comparison with recent evidence within the area, the multiple methodological concerns seem not to change this conclusion. Therefore, implementing FMT for rCDI in clinical practice should be strongly considered." @default.
• W3120406064 created "2021-01-18" @default.
• W3120406064 creator A5021059063 @default.
• W3120406064 creator A5030434452 @default.
• W3120406064 creator A5053920924 @default.
• W3120406064 creator A5054828864 @default.
• W3120406064 date "2021-01-13" @default.
• W3120406064 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W3120406064 title "Health economic evaluations comparing faecal microbiota transplantation with antibiotics for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review" @default.
• W3120406064 cites W12101965 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W1916481354 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2008535379 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2015923150 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2033649854 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2097330653 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2112066550 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2113556993 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2119114528 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2131038214 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2134900799 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2135959117 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2148171446 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2161598839 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2168220466 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2196441926 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2283157683 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2551264568 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2573649779 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2593187224 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2626143723 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2788853459 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2791326569 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2802837662 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2886061305 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2901615846 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2907954911 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2913734248 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2924749311 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2971534115 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W2994911205 @default.
• W3120406064 cites W3022903699 @default.
• W3120406064 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-021-00301-7" @default.
• W3120406064 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7805077" @default.
• W3120406064 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33439367" @default.
• W3120406064 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3120406064 type Work @default.
• W3120406064 sameAs 3120406064 @default.
• W3120406064 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W3120406064 countsByYear W31204060642021 @default.
• W3120406064 countsByYear W31204060642022 @default.
• W3120406064 countsByYear W31204060642023 @default.
• W3120406064 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3120406064 hasAuthorship W3120406064A5021059063 @default.
• W3120406064 hasAuthorship W3120406064A5030434452 @default.
• W3120406064 hasAuthorship W3120406064A5053920924 @default.
• W3120406064 hasAuthorship W3120406064A5054828864 @default.
• W3120406064 hasBestOaLocation W31204060641 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2776738588 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2777396551 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2778980435 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2779489039 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2781342628 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C2910067853 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C524218345 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C112930515 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C126322002 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C138816342 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C142724271 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C159110408 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C160735492 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C17744445 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C177713679 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C199539241 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2776125615 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2776738588 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2777396551 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2778980435 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2779489039 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2779951463 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2781342628 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C2910067853 @default.
• W3120406064 hasConceptScore W3120406064C3019080777 @default.

• next