FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3207592331> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3207592331 abstract "Stigma and informal caregiving are determinants for health and wellbeing, but few studies have examined stigma towards informal caregiving. Public stigma may be expressed differently towards caregivers depending on their gender and employment status due to societal norms. Therefore, this study analyzes if there is a difference in public stigma shown by the general population toward informal caregivers of care recipients aged 65 years or older based on the observed caregiver's gender or working status.A cross-sectional study was conducted in Germany. Data from 1038 adult participants from the general population in Germany were assessed with an Online-Survey. They were recruited with a quota-system based on the German micro census. Participants were randomly assigned to one of 16 vignettes describing a caregiving situation, which varied in the caregiver's gender and working status, and care recipient's gender and type of impairment. After reading the vignette, they were asked to provide sociodemographic information and complete three questionnaires on public stigma assessing their emotional (Emotional Reactions), behavioral (Social Distance) and cognitive reaction (Statements on informal caregivers) to the caregiver described in the vignette. Regression analyses, adjusted for sociodemographic data of the participants, were conducted.Findings indicated an association between reading about male caregivers and increased social distance, compared with reading about female caregivers. Reading about working caregivers was associated with decreased social distance and increased appreciative statements, compared to reading about non-working caregivers. Analyses after stratifying by gender of the caregiver in the vignette indicated an association between reading about female working caregivers and increased appreciative statements, compared to reading about female non-working caregivers. When stratifying by working status, an association was found between reading about male working caregivers and increased social distance, when compared to reading about female working caregivers.This study's findings indicate that gender and working status of the perceived informal caregivers are of relevance to the public stigma directed towards these caregivers. Male and non-working informal caregivers were shown more public stigma than female and working informal caregivers. Thus, interventions to reduce public stigma, in particular towards male and non-working caregivers, are recommended." @default.
• W3207592331 created "2021-10-25" @default.
• W3207592331 creator A5002369322 @default.
• W3207592331 creator A5020870667 @default.
• W3207592331 creator A5022832894 @default.
• W3207592331 creator A5051290664 @default.
• W3207592331 creator A5055377709 @default.
• W3207592331 creator A5066801947 @default.
• W3207592331 date "2021-10-16" @default.
• W3207592331 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W3207592331 title "Are informal family caregivers stigmatized differently based on their gender or employment status?: a German study on public stigma towards informal long-term caregivers of older individuals" @default.
• W3207592331 cites W102861764 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1481586358 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1555219932 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1763464779 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W180557820 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1967437206 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1967867804 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1977253188 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W1989677834 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2015095576 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2023873216 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2042352654 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2062111009 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2067294897 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2080844455 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2083049992 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2089918343 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2101958269 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2104804522 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2104888525 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2109041553 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2115909570 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2126724189 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2129185112 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2134104300 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2136965053 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2137829687 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2144703530 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2155680529 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2157216651 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2161480337 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2166098914 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2166730164 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2169699807 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2292311774 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2550267280 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2565633433 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2585744943 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2729603655 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2767094646 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2782984113 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2796086380 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2802109685 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2810234679 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2810747632 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2884148086 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2885470834 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2899499737 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2964634074 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2965616656 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W2966709747 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W3016943055 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W3049358333 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W3110214369 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W4205961606 @default.
• W3207592331 cites W4213367093 @default.
• W3207592331 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11955-7" @default.
• W3207592331 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8520205" @default.
• W3207592331 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34656105" @default.
• W3207592331 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3207592331 type Work @default.
• W3207592331 sameAs 3207592331 @default.
• W3207592331 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3207592331 countsByYear W32075923312022 @default.
• W3207592331 countsByYear W32075923312023 @default.
• W3207592331 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3207592331 hasAuthorship W3207592331A5002369322 @default.
• W3207592331 hasAuthorship W3207592331A5020870667 @default.
• W3207592331 hasAuthorship W3207592331A5022832894 @default.
• W3207592331 hasAuthorship W3207592331A5051290664 @default.
• W3207592331 hasAuthorship W3207592331A5055377709 @default.
• W3207592331 hasAuthorship W3207592331A5066801947 @default.
• W3207592331 hasBestOaLocation W32075923311 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C168285401 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C9719361 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConceptScore W3207592331C118552586 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConceptScore W3207592331C138816342 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConceptScore W3207592331C15744967 @default.
• W3207592331 hasConceptScore W3207592331C159110408 @default.

• next