Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281477033> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4281477033 endingPage "e34561" @default.
- W4281477033 startingPage "e34561" @default.
- W4281477033 abstract "The Diabetes Questionnaire is a digital patient-reported outcome and experience measure for adults living with diabetes. The Diabetes Questionnaire is intended for use in routine clinical visits in diabetes care and to enable patient perspectives to be integrated into the Swedish National Diabetes Register. The Diabetes Questionnaire was developed on the basis of patients' perspectives, and evidence for its measurement qualities has been demonstrated. Patients receive an invitation to complete the questionnaire before clinical visits, and the patient and health care professional (HCP) can discuss the findings, which are instantly displayed during the visit. Implementation processes for new tools in routine care need to be studied to understand the influence of contextual factors, the support needed, and how patients and HCPs experience clinical use.The aim of this study was to describe patients' and HCPs' experiences of initiating the use of the digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a clinical tool in routine diabetes care, supported by a structured implementation strategy involving initial education, local facilitators, and regular follow-ups.In this qualitative study, semistructured focus group discussions were conducted 12 months after the use of the Diabetes Questionnaire was initiated. Participants were diabetes specialist nurses and physicians (20 participants in 4 groups) at hospital-based outpatient clinics or primary health care clinics and adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (15 participants in 4 groups). The audiotaped transcripts were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis.The results revealed 2 main categories that integrated patients' and HCPs' experiences, which together formed an overarching theme: While implementation demands new approaches, the Diabetes Questionnaire provides a broader perspective. The first main category (The Diabetes Questionnaire supports person-centered clinical visits) comprised comments expressing that the digital Diabetes Questionnaire can initiate and encourage reflection in preparation for clinical visits, bring important topics to light during clinical visits, and broaden the scope of discussion by providing additional information. The second main category (The process of initiating the implementation of the Diabetes Questionnaire) comprised comments that described differences in engagement among HCPs and their managers, challenges of establishing new routines, experiences of support during implementation, thoughts about the Diabetes Questionnaire, need to change local administrative routines, and opportunities and concerns for continued use.The Diabetes Questionnaire can broaden the scope of health data in routine diabetes care. While implementation demands new approaches, patients and HCPs saw potential positive impacts of using the questionnaire at both the individual and group levels. Our results can inform further development of implementation strategies to support the clinical use of the questionnaire." @default.
- W4281477033 created "2022-05-26" @default.
- W4281477033 creator A5028668190 @default.
- W4281477033 creator A5037154532 @default.
- W4281477033 creator A5039878870 @default.
- W4281477033 creator A5039905874 @default.
- W4281477033 creator A5078041916 @default.
- W4281477033 date "2022-05-25" @default.
- W4281477033 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4281477033 title "Implementing the Digital Diabetes Questionnaire as a Clinical Tool in Routine Diabetes Care: Focus Group Discussions With Patients and Health Care Professionals" @default.
- W4281477033 cites W1989549082 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2016003897 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2077813679 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2081964994 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2085001923 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2096870505 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2107174149 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2121566631 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2122328334 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2124199620 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2140019612 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2144185507 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2152345693 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2310846869 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2556561633 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2721771326 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2734420136 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2766357945 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2889449831 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2894826729 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2895511500 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2895533920 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2908252299 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2908855919 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2937692302 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2941268450 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2946650770 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2968513459 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2982394256 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2990224834 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W2992256297 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3004501181 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3024972995 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3040915683 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3047671656 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3049364564 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3092587796 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3100555144 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3107521704 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3120745414 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3127375220 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3138800395 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3147140811 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3156584421 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W3169514738 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4213222556 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4230007976 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4232013032 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4233732280 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4236126199 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4253539425 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4254445254 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4292528167 @default.
- W4281477033 cites W4376596387 @default.
- W4281477033 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/34561" @default.
- W4281477033 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35612885" @default.
- W4281477033 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4281477033 type Work @default.
- W4281477033 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4281477033 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4281477033 hasAuthorship W4281477033A5028668190 @default.
- W4281477033 hasAuthorship W4281477033A5037154532 @default.
- W4281477033 hasAuthorship W4281477033A5039878870 @default.
- W4281477033 hasAuthorship W4281477033A5039905874 @default.
- W4281477033 hasAuthorship W4281477033A5078041916 @default.
- W4281477033 hasBestOaLocation W42814770331 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C134018914 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C144024400 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C144133560 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C159110408 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C160735492 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C162324750 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C162853370 @default.
- W4281477033 hasConceptScore W4281477033C190248442 @default.