FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4281570352> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4281570352 endingPage "e0268182" @default.
• W4281570352 startingPage "e0268182" @default.
• W4281570352 abstract "Background Robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP) is widely used to surgically treat of localized prostate cancer. Among RARP, retzius-sparing techniques(RS-RARP) are implemented through douglas pouch, not the existing conventional approach(C-RARP). We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including recent published papers. Materials & methods Systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guideline. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched up to August 2021. We conducted meta-analysis as follows; Participants, patients with biopsy-proven PCa; Interventions, Patients underwent C-RARP or RS-RALP; Outcomes, comparison of continence recovery rate, positive surgical margins(PSM), complication, operation time and estimated blood loss(EBL) included for analysis. Results Thirteen studies with a total of 2917 patients were included for meta-analysis. Among them, three were randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies and the rest were non-RCT studies. Incontinence was analyzed with zero pad and safety pad, respectively. There showed a statistically significant advantage for RS-RARP in terms of continence recovery at 1 month(0 pad; OR 0.28, (0.16–0.47), safety-pad; OR 0.12 (0.07–0.22), p<0.001), as well as at 3 months(0 pad; OR 0.31 (0.18–0.53), safety-pad; OR 0.23 (0.14–0.40) p<0.001), 6 months(0 pad; OR 0.29 (0.17–0.51), safety-pad; OR 0.13 (0.06–0.27), p<0.001). And after 12 months, RS-RARP showed better results only in the safety-pad(0 pad; OR 0.64 (0.35–1.18), p = 0.15, safety-pad; OR 0.12 (0.04–0.36), p<0.001). In PSM, there was no statistical difference between two group at overall stage, but RS-RARP was observed to be higher than C-RARP in pT3 subgroup analysis(OR 0.74 (0.55–0.99), p = 0.047) (Fig 1). Whereas, there was no significant difference between the two groups in complication, operation time, and EBL. Conclusions Our analysis showed that RS-RARP is superior about early continence recovery than C-RARP. However, RS-RARP showed relatively high PSM in locally advanced PCa of pT3 or above. Therefore, although RS-RARP has few advantages about functional outcomes, we think that caution should be exercised when approaching patients with high-risk local diseases." @default.
• W4281570352 created "2022-05-27" @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5016192059 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5025144976 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5029056747 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5048382900 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5077899911 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5078416571 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5080173208 @default.
• W4281570352 creator A5089303143 @default.
• W4281570352 date "2022-05-26" @default.
• W4281570352 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4281570352 title "Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4281570352 cites W156230426 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W1974833256 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W1997597229 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2000087081 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2024076200 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2062576898 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2098923148 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2103941427 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2107340278 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2111722073 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2113029988 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2116475791 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2119623868 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2142193039 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2150849842 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2154875583 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2158210140 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2408017125 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2441875181 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W246286872 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2506981106 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2609576706 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2610621502 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2752869925 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2770377223 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2772341229 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2776628058 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2888212506 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2901338386 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2909456033 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2945746917 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2964766379 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2964907113 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2966561736 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2988290606 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2999213317 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W2999417355 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3014900765 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3033714242 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3035006788 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3038343127 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3046703631 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3046952668 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3087084191 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3094390299 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3160850173 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W3195073346 @default.
• W4281570352 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W4281570352 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268182" @default.
• W4281570352 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35617274" @default.
• W4281570352 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4281570352 type Work @default.
• W4281570352 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4281570352 countsByYear W42815703522022 @default.
• W4281570352 countsByYear W42815703522023 @default.
• W4281570352 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5016192059 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5025144976 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5029056747 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5048382900 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5077899911 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5078416571 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5080173208 @default.
• W4281570352 hasAuthorship W4281570352A5089303143 @default.
• W4281570352 hasBestOaLocation W42815703521 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C2910468371 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConceptScore W4281570352C121608353 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConceptScore W4281570352C126322002 @default.
• W4281570352 hasConceptScore W4281570352C126894567 @default.

• next