FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4297274102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4297274102 endingPage "e068921" @default.
• W4297274102 startingPage "e068921" @default.
• W4297274102 abstract "Abstract Objective To examine the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and risk of colorectal cancer among men and women from three large prospective cohorts. Design Prospective cohort study with dietary intake assessed every four years using food frequency questionnaires. Setting Three large US cohorts. Participants Men (n= 46 341) from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2014) and women (n=159 907) from the Nurses’ Health Study (1986-2014; n=67 425) and the Nurses’ Health Study II (1991-2015; n=92 482) with valid dietary intake measurement and no cancer diagnosis at baseline. Main outcome measure Association between ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer, estimated using time varying Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors. Results 3216 cases of colorectal cancer (men, n=1294; women, n=1922) were documented during the 24-28 years of follow-up. Compared with those in the lowest fifth of ultra-processed food consumption, men in the highest fifth of consumption had a 29% higher risk of developing colorectal cancer (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.53; P for trend=0.01), and the positive association was limited to distal colon cancer (72% increased risk; hazard ratio 1.72, 1.24 to 2.37; P for trend<0.001). These associations remained significant after further adjustment for body mass index or indicators of nutritional quality of the diet (that is, western dietary pattern or dietary quality score). No association was observed between overall ultra-processed food consumption and risk of colorectal cancer among women. Among subgroups of ultra-processed foods, higher consumption of meat/poultry/seafood based ready-to-eat products (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.44, 1.20 to 1.73; P for trend<0.001) and sugar sweetened beverages (1.21, 1.01 to 1.44; P for trend=0.013) among men and ready-to-eat/heat mixed dishes among women (1.17, 1.01 to 1.36; P for trend=0.02) was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer; yogurt and dairy based desserts were negatively associated with the risk of colorectal cancer among women (hazard ratio 0.83, 0.71 to 0.97; P for trend=0.002). Conclusions In the three large prospective cohorts, high consumption of total ultra-processed foods in men and certain subgroups of ultra-processed foods in men and women was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Further studies are needed to better understand the potential attributes of ultra-processed foods that contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis." @default.
• W4297274102 created "2022-09-28" @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5005240568 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5012577626 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5017604004 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5029484872 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5035209058 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5038373228 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5039598820 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5064834293 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5073531557 @default.
• W4297274102 creator A5082055342 @default.
• W4297274102 date "2022-08-31" @default.
• W4297274102 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4297274102 title "Association of ultra-processed food consumption with colorectal cancer risk among men and women: results from three prospective US cohort studies" @default.
• W4297274102 cites W1500407882 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W1579160800 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W1914096367 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W1978589042 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W1989947363 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2003598913 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2008559971 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2013974060 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2029348349 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2059084331 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2068629868 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2077466352 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2078770291 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2080317818 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2084954009 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2098787760 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2120021843 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2134657806 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2152127469 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2163488353 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2167837946 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2170404172 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2293621304 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2298338128 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2481340050 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2500421697 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2510411424 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2552455477 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2553390583 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2588919095 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2593115065 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2594360546 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2766563704 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2767285442 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2781525129 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2790928417 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2792720753 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2883015258 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2894700748 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2911640446 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2943702090 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2946281272 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2964474706 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W2970045605 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3015171497 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3033550145 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3049022684 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3129041288 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3134335340 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3139243481 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3153374447 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3164215838 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3187841862 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3200514883 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W3205519222 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W4206296122 @default.
• W4297274102 cites W4241213914 @default.
• W4297274102 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068921" @default.
• W4297274102 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4297274102 type Work @default.
• W4297274102 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W4297274102 countsByYear W42972741022021 @default.
• W4297274102 countsByYear W42972741022022 @default.
• W4297274102 countsByYear W42972741022023 @default.
• W4297274102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5005240568 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5012577626 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5017604004 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5029484872 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5035209058 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5038373228 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5039598820 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5064834293 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5073531557 @default.
• W4297274102 hasAuthorship W4297274102A5082055342 @default.
• W4297274102 hasBestOaLocation W42972741021 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C186615474 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W4297274102 hasConcept C201903717 @default.

• next