Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1008075221> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W1008075221 endingPage "3478" @default.
- W1008075221 startingPage "3477" @default.
- W1008075221 abstract "Purpose: In this study, we investigate the effect of setup uncertainty on DVH calculations which may impact plan comparison. Methods: Treatment plans (6 MV VMAT calculated on Pinnacle TPS) were chosen for different disease sites: brain, prostate, H&N and spine in this retrospective study. A proton plan (PP) using double scattering beams was generated for each selected VMAT plan subject to the same set of dose-volume constraints as in VMAT. An uncertainty analysis was incorporated on the DVH calculations in which isocenter shifts from 1 to 5 mm in each of the ±x, ±y and ±z directions were used to simulate the setup uncertainty and residual positioning errors. A total of 40 different combinations of isocenter shifts were used in the re-calculation of DVH of the PTV and the various OARs for both the VMAT and the corresponding PT. Results: For the brain case, both VMAT and PP are comparable in PTV coverage and OAR sparing, and VMAT is a clear choice for treatment due to its ease of delivery. However, when incorporating isoshifts in DVH calculations, a significant change in dose-volume relationship emerges. For example, both VMAT and PT provide adequate coverage, even with ±3mm isoshift. However, +3mm isoshift results in increase of V40(Lcochlea, VMAT) from 7.2% in the original plan to 45% and V40(R cochlea, VMAT) from 75% to 92%. For protons, V40(Lcochlea, PT) increases from 62% in the initial plan to 75%, while V40(Rcochea, PT) increases from 7% to 26%. Conclusion: DVH alone may not be sufficient to allow an unequivocal decision in plan comparison, especially when two rival plans are very similar in both PTV coverage and OAR sparing. It is a good practice to incorporate uncertainty analysis on photon and proton plan comparison studies to test the plan robustness in plan evaluation." @default.
- W1008075221 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1008075221 creator A5030876153 @default.
- W1008075221 creator A5037497883 @default.
- W1008075221 creator A5042837087 @default.
- W1008075221 creator A5054528803 @default.
- W1008075221 creator A5064141921 @default.
- W1008075221 date "2015-06-01" @default.
- W1008075221 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1008075221 title "SU-E-T-615: Plan Comparison Between Photon IMRT and Proton Plans Incorporating Uncertainty Analysis" @default.
- W1008075221 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4924978" @default.
- W1008075221 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W1008075221 type Work @default.
- W1008075221 sameAs 1008075221 @default.
- W1008075221 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1008075221 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1008075221 hasAuthorship W1008075221A5030876153 @default.
- W1008075221 hasAuthorship W1008075221A5037497883 @default.
- W1008075221 hasAuthorship W1008075221A5042837087 @default.
- W1008075221 hasAuthorship W1008075221A5054528803 @default.
- W1008075221 hasAuthorship W1008075221A5064141921 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C181401712 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C2776017024 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C2779244869 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C54516573 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C104293457 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C121332964 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C126838900 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C181401712 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C185544564 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C19527891 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C201645570 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C2776017024 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C2779244869 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C2989005 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C41008148 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C509974204 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C54516573 @default.
- W1008075221 hasConceptScore W1008075221C71924100 @default.
- W1008075221 hasIssue "6Part22" @default.
- W1008075221 hasLocation W10080752211 @default.
- W1008075221 hasOpenAccess W1008075221 @default.
- W1008075221 hasPrimaryLocation W10080752211 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W1500316510 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W1967584914 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W1975250955 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W1997473995 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W2011462344 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W2012256023 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W2017617205 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W2041810761 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W2471151300 @default.
- W1008075221 hasRelatedWork W2471848632 @default.
- W1008075221 hasVolume "42" @default.
- W1008075221 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1008075221 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1008075221 magId "1008075221" @default.
- W1008075221 workType "article" @default.