FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W101060469> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W101060469 endingPage "430" @default.
• W101060469 startingPage "422" @default.
• W101060469 abstract "This study is an empirical examination of possible differences between female and college seniors' perceptions between and female college professors. Subjects were presented with three variations of a scale designed to measure students' perceptions of university professors in general, female professors, and professors. These students, both and female, perceived that both and female professors resembled university professors in general to a greater degree than female professors resembled university professors. When females were compared with males using positive and negative items from the measurement scale, fifty three positive items could be used to describe female professors and only forty eight could be used to describe professors. ********** No one would argue that there are differences between males and females. However, some segments of society have made the fact that women are different from men synonymous with the belief that women are, in some ways, inferior to men. One such area may be in higher education and the evaluation of professors by students. Several studies have looked at gender bias in student evaluations of professors. Such studies have had a variety of results. For example, Feldman (1993), Bachen, McLoughlin, and Garcia (1999) and Basow (1995) reported little or no, or inconsistent gender bias. Basow (1998) reported that students reacted differently to professor behavior based on their (student) gender. She also reported that professors behave differently in the classroom based on their gender. In a more recent study, Basow (2000) found that gender factors were involved in students' perceptions of and reactions to professors. In this study, she used a questionnaire consisting of two open-end questions: 1- Think of the professor you've had in college; and, 2- Describe what made him or her the 'best' in your opinion. The same questions were then asked with the term worst substituted for best. Female professors were chosen best more frequently by their female students and less frequently by their students than expected. Gender differences in choice of worst professors were not present. Students criticized the same things regardless of the sex of the professor. The purpose of the present study was to extend the Schein's (1973, 1975) original male managerial concept to include university professors. Is there a male professor which has the same negative effect on the careers of aspiring female professors as does the managerial stereotype on women's careers in management? In addressing this question we wished to see whether outcomes would be different from Basow's (2000) results, which used a retrospective technique. METHOD The sample consisted of 242 students enrolled in the capstone course (Business Policy) within the business school of an AACSB accredited university located in the eastern part of the United States. Descriptive Index forms were distributed randomly and participation in filling out the questionnaire was voluntary and anonymous. There were three variations of the questionnaire dispensed. Students did not know that three variations existed. Of the total of 121 questionnaires distributed, 234 usable forms were returned. The average age of the group was 23.4 years. The sample consisted of 134 students (average age: 23.6) and 100 females (average age: 22.8). MEASURING INSTRUMENT The 92-item descriptive index originated by Schein (1973, 1975) was used in this study. This index has been used several times, (including Brenner, Tomkiewicz and Schein (1989); Heilman, Block, Martell, & Simon (1989); Dodge, Gilroy, & Fenzel (1995); Tomkiewicz and Brenner (1996); Tomkiewicz and Bello (1997); Tomkiewicz, Brenner and Bello (1998), and Tomkiewicz (1999) to define male, female, African American, white, and Hispanic race stereotypes and the characteristics of managers and successful middle managers. …" @default.
• W101060469 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W101060469 creator A5091649818 @default.
• W101060469 creator A5082336027 @default.
• W101060469 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W101060469 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W101060469 title "Differences between Male Students' and Female Students' Perception of Professors." @default.
• W101060469 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W101060469 type Work @default.
• W101060469 sameAs 101060469 @default.
• W101060469 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W101060469 countsByYear W1010604692017 @default.
• W101060469 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W101060469 hasAuthorship W101060469A5082336027 @default.
• W101060469 hasAuthorship W101060469A5091649818 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C2776684731 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C2983427547 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W101060469 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C120912362 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C121332964 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C138496976 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C138885662 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C15708023 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C15744967 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C169760540 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C17744445 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C199539241 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C26760741 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C2776684731 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C2778755073 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C2983427547 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C62520636 @default.
• W101060469 hasConceptScore W101060469C77805123 @default.
• W101060469 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W101060469 hasLocation W1010604691 @default.
• W101060469 hasOpenAccess W101060469 @default.
• W101060469 hasPrimaryLocation W1010604691 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W1967321546 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2010026825 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2022050668 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2031878277 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2035317549 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2039430696 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2067297596 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2092793310 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2132754288 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2234665999 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2249233652 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2725952166 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2740915444 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2904127273 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2942230668 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2967988909 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W3047204361 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W3185333991 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W76044184 @default.
• W101060469 hasRelatedWork W2585317154 @default.
• W101060469 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W101060469 isParatext "false" @default.
• W101060469 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W101060469 magId "101060469" @default.
• W101060469 workType "article" @default.