FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1011831166> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1011831166 abstract "Introduction Scarcity of clinical placements and heightened concern for patient safety have led to an increased focus on simulation methodologies for the early acquisition of clinical technical, human engagement and reasoning skills, in parallel with clinically-based learning opportunities in undergraduate medical education. Background Feedback from senior medical students and their supervising clinicians identified the need to supplement the skills learning from clinical placements with structured learning opportunities. Methods A learning methodology was developed that combines the reasoning-development approach of Problem Based Learning with high fidelity clinical simulation. Students were divided into teams of five (designated as a 'registrar' and four 'interns') who managed a simulated patient through an evolving story over the period of a week. Innovative elements included extensive use of trained simulated patients and relatives, technological simulations, after hours 'on call' experiences and a simulated court case involving cross examination of learners by an experienced barrister. 150 Year 3 medical students undertook the program in 2009. Evaluation was undertaken using standardised questionnaires, as well as Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of learners' reflective journals to identify evidence of learning in the affective domain (values, attitudes and human engagement). Results The program was very positively received by learners (mean subjective effectiveness score of 6.38 on a 7-point Likert scale). Analysis of journals revealed numerous examples of deep reflection and affective learning in association with the program. Conclusion The SCIMs methodology shows promise for promoting the initial acquisition of essential clinical skills in a safe environment, as an adjunct to clinical attachments. References Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the evidence? Mt Sinai Journal of Medicine 76(4):330-43, 2009. Spalding WB. The undergraduate medical curriculum (1969 model): McMaster University. Canadian Medical Association Journal 100(14):659-664, 1969. Flanagan B, Nestel D, Joseph M. Making patient safety the focus: Crisis Resource Management in the undergraduate curriculum. Medical Education 38:56-66, 2004. Smith JA. Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in health psychology. Psychology and Health 11:261-71, 1996. Rogers GD, McConnell H, Milligan E, Lombard M, Jones de Rooy N. Desperately seeking evidence of learning in the affective domain: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of clinical learners' reflective journals. Paper at this conference, 2010." @default.
• W1011831166 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1011831166 creator A5019756496 @default.
• W1011831166 creator A5031635907 @default.
• W1011831166 creator A5033357221 @default.
• W1011831166 creator A5051610139 @default.
• W1011831166 creator A5069540767 @default.
• W1011831166 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W1011831166 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1011831166 title "Structured Clinical Insights Modules (SCIMs): High fidelity simulated scenarios for learning clinical skills and clinical reasoning" @default.
• W1011831166 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1011831166 type Work @default.
• W1011831166 sameAs 1011831166 @default.
• W1011831166 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1011831166 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1011831166 hasAuthorship W1011831166A5019756496 @default.
• W1011831166 hasAuthorship W1011831166A5031635907 @default.
• W1011831166 hasAuthorship W1011831166A5033357221 @default.
• W1011831166 hasAuthorship W1011831166A5051610139 @default.
• W1011831166 hasAuthorship W1011831166A5069540767 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C2776459999 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C105776082 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C138496976 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C15744967 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C2776459999 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C41008148 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C509550671 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C71924100 @default.
• W1011831166 hasConceptScore W1011831166C76155785 @default.
• W1011831166 hasLocation W10118311661 @default.
• W1011831166 hasOpenAccess W1011831166 @default.
• W1011831166 hasPrimaryLocation W10118311661 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W1606411159 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W1989909689 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W1998697515 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2044788996 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2057826938 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2066922778 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2070896622 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2095898214 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2115873051 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2130252913 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2185407814 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2286457604 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2528136630 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2620583153 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2755687749 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2884102809 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W2901644696 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W3022792929 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W3108653765 @default.
• W1011831166 hasRelatedWork W3201026864 @default.
• W1011831166 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1011831166 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1011831166 magId "1011831166" @default.
• W1011831166 workType "article" @default.