FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W101430924> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W101430924 endingPage "489" @default.
• W101430924 startingPage "480" @default.
• W101430924 abstract "Abdominoperineal resections for rectal carcinoma are being performed with decreasing frequency in favor of sphincter-saving resections. It remains, however, to be unequivocally demonstrated that sphincter preservation has not resulted in compromised local disease control, disease-free survival, and survival. Accordingly, it is the specific aim of this endeavor to compare local recurrence, disease-free survival, and survival in patients with Dukes' B and C rectal cancer undergoing curative abdominoperineal resection or sphincter-saving resection. For the purpose of this study, 232 patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection and 181 subjected to sphincter-saving resections were available for analysis from an NSABP randomized prospective clinical trial designed to ascertain the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in rectal carcinoma (protocol R-01). The mean time on study was 48 months. Analyses were carried out comparing the two operations according to Dukes' class, the number of positive nodes, and tumor size. The only significant differences in disease-free survival and survival were observed for the cohort characterized by greater than 4 positive nodes and were in favor of patients treated with sphincter-saving resections. A patient undergoing sphincter-saving resection was 0.62 times as likely to sustain a treatment failure as a similar patient undergoing abdominoperineal resection (p = 0.07) and 0.49 times as likely to die (p = 0.02). The inability to demonstrate an attenuated disease-free survival and survival for patients treated with sphincter-saving resection was in spite of an increased incidence of local recurrence (anastomotic and pelvic) observed for the latter operation when compared to abdominoperineal resection (13% vs. 5%). A similar analysis evaluating the length of margins of resection in patients undergoing sphincter-preserving operations indicated that treatment failure and survival were not significantly different in patients whose distal resection margins were less than 2 cm, 2-2.9 cm, or greater than or equal to 3 cm. If any trend was observed, it appeared that patients with smaller resection margins had a slightly prolonged survival (p = 0.10). This observation was present in spite of the fact that local recurrence as a first site of treatment failure was greater in the group with less than 2 cm that it was in the greater than or equal to 3 cm category, 22% versus 12%. This increased local recurrence rate in the population with smaller margins was not translated into an in crease in overall treatment failure and had absolutely no influence on survival. It is suggested that local recurrence serves as a marker of distant disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)" @default.
• W101430924 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W101430924 creator A5055013606 @default.
• W101430924 creator A5078282647 @default.
• W101430924 date "1986-10-01" @default.
• W101430924 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W101430924 title "An Analysis of Survival and Treatment Failure Following Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-saving Resection in Dukesʼ B and C Rectal Carcinoma" @default.
• W101430924 cites W1496546950 @default.
• W101430924 cites W1519241935 @default.
• W101430924 cites W170242726 @default.
• W101430924 cites W1995388397 @default.
• W101430924 cites W1999476324 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2001079137 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2004203226 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2009925508 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2013366887 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2015011268 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2030859656 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2040427131 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2042502382 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2047167659 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2047466306 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2058374938 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2065586010 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2070113495 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2071485106 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2079670078 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2411249732 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2414512061 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2420059622 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2438213650 @default.
• W101430924 cites W2917410187 @default.
• W101430924 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198610000-00016" @default.
• W101430924 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1251324" @default.
• W101430924 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3532972" @default.
• W101430924 hasPublicationYear "1986" @default.
• W101430924 type Work @default.
• W101430924 sameAs 101430924 @default.
• W101430924 citedByCount "158" @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242012 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242013 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242014 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242015 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242016 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242017 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242018 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242019 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242020 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242021 @default.
• W101430924 countsByYear W1014309242022 @default.
• W101430924 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W101430924 hasAuthorship W101430924A5055013606 @default.
• W101430924 hasAuthorship W101430924A5078282647 @default.
• W101430924 hasBestOaLocation W1014309242 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C2776283816 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C2777546739 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C2780877482 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C2781171867 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C2991871042 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W101430924 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C121608353 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C126322002 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C141071460 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C168563851 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C2776283816 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C2777546739 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C2780877482 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C2781171867 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C2991871042 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C526805850 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C71924100 @default.
• W101430924 hasConceptScore W101430924C8443397 @default.
• W101430924 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W101430924 hasLocation W1014309241 @default.
• W101430924 hasLocation W1014309242 @default.
• W101430924 hasLocation W1014309243 @default.
• W101430924 hasOpenAccess W101430924 @default.
• W101430924 hasPrimaryLocation W1014309241 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2327865667 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2329564966 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2358991703 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2365705383 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2380843144 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2411711505 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2591877014 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W2753825859 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W4290399109 @default.
• W101430924 hasRelatedWork W96741517 @default.
• W101430924 hasVolume "204" @default.
• W101430924 isParatext "false" @default.
• W101430924 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W101430924 magId "101430924" @default.

• next