FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W101795514> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W101795514 abstract "The research explored perceptions of preparedness for bushfire-related matters at the rural-urban community of Tamborine Mountain. A literature review expressed the need for changes in bushfire mitigation/management as a result of the need for increased self-reliance. The social construction of risk methodology was applied to a multi-method case study to derive and deliver an analysis of agreements and differences in the perceptions/expectations of fire services and the community (see results below).How the fire services’ and the community’s perceptions/expectations agreed: 1. There are varied degrees of perception regarding bushfire risk.2. Experience with fire appears to be related to awareness of associated risks.3. Risk awareness does not appear to be related to recent Australian bushfire events.4. The overall view was that fire breaks are a necessary fire management initiative.5. The local bushfire season was perceived to be from early spring to summer.6. There is a need for Bushfire Management Plans to be effectively implemented.How the fire services’ and the community’s perceptions/expectations differed: Fire services’ perspective: 1. Most people in the community would rely on fire services to respond in the event of a fire.2. Most people are unaware of the bushfire risk.3. The public expects things to be done for them.4. Controlled burns are not wanted by the public.5. Provision of advice is possible but can not tell residents they need to take action.Community’s perspective: 1. At least half of survey respondents reported they would not rely on help from fire services in the event of a fire.2. Most people reported being aware of the bushfire risk but have other priorities in their life that take precedence.3. The survey results indicated that individual householders see themselves as the most responsible for personal and home safety.4. Respondents supported controlled burns as long as they are carefully done.5. Respondents reported feeling frustrated that specific advice is not provided.Bushfire-related matters that need further resolution: Also important for the basis of discussion are some bushfire-related matters that need further resolution. These matters are separate from how the perceptions/expectations agreed and differed because they were solely from either the fire services’ or the community’s perspective (as represented below).Bushfire-related matters identified through interviews with the fire services: 1. Fire services perceive there is confusion within the community about the roles of urban and rural fire brigades.2. Fire services want to improve their capacity to convert data and information relevant to bushfire mitigation and management into knowledge to guide decisions.3. Fire services were interested in how they can inform the public of the need for preparation against the risk of bushfire without sensationalising the topic.4. Fire services see that it is necessary to find ways of improving the community’sparticipation in bushfire mitigation and management.Bushfire-related matters that arose from the community survey and community group interviews: 1. Community groups seek operation of optimum controlled burn return intervals.2. Research data indicated a high proportion of retired people in the community.Strategies need to be developed to effectively engage such resources of time andknowledge.3. Survey respondents indicated that they are not confident in the costs of protecting property against fire and bushfire safety aspects to do or use if the need arose.4. A wide range of media was identified as being the preferred way of receiving information, direct engagement with fire services was the least preferred.Survey and interview results were interpreted into the key research findings (as presented on this and the previous page) and were used as the basis of discussion. Theresearch findings were distilled into patterns of language and further summarised into a common language so that they could be compared and combined with similar research such as the findings and recommendations of State and Federal Governments of Australia. A common language related to preparedness for bushfire has the potential for fire services, Governments and communities to move forward with bushfire community education efforts. The research findings indicated that the community’s preparedness for bushfire was especially associated with the topics of risk perception, experience of fire, confidence in bushfire safety aspects and responsibility for life/property protection and less associated with controlled burning acceptance, impact of educational efforts and cost/effort required.The research explored contemporary bushfire issues in an at-risk-from-bushfire Australian rural-urban locality adjacent to and mixed amongst protected areas. The term “marginalised” can be used to describe the landscape of some places partly as a result of the effects of bushfire. Some people are “marginalised” because of how their perceptions/situation regarding bushfire-related matters shape their behaviours and attitudes towards preparedness for bushfire. This finding is of particular concern to fire services throughout Australia as are expanding rural-urban interface areas, difficulties in impacting upon targeted areas for community education and the possible increase in the incidence of adverse weather conditions. The current situation is that citizens need to be aware of their exposure to hazardous conditions, and share responsibility for the mitigation of bushfires.The research provides the relevant information to understand preparedness for bushfire issues from the local fire services’ and an at-risk-from-bushfire rural-urban community’s perspectives. Where there is agreement between fire services and the community, investment in communication is about reinforcing shared perceptions/ expectations. The differences in perceptions/expectations highlight those areas that need particular attention by fire services and communities alike. It was an important priority for the research to effectively capture certain locals’ perspectives, especially those with fire experience so that such invaluable knowledge is recorded. The case study illustrated a snapshot of a rural-urban community with bushfire-related matters as a medium to communicate that. This thesis provided an unbiased account of stakeholder perspectives with an emphasis upon recognition of the different constructions of bushfire risk within a community as a part of the transition towards increased self-sufficiency for bushfire preparations and shared responsibility for the protection of life and property." @default.
• W101795514 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W101795514 creator A5090279309 @default.
• W101795514 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W101795514 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W101795514 title "Perceptions of preparedness for bushfire: a case study of Tamborine Mountain" @default.
• W101795514 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W101795514 type Work @default.
• W101795514 sameAs 101795514 @default.
• W101795514 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W101795514 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W101795514 hasAuthorship W101795514A5090279309 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C163355716 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C2777042776 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W101795514 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C107826830 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C15744967 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C163355716 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C169760540 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C17744445 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C199539241 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C205649164 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C26760741 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C2777042776 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C39432304 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C39549134 @default.
• W101795514 hasConceptScore W101795514C91375879 @default.
• W101795514 hasLocation W1017955141 @default.
• W101795514 hasOpenAccess W101795514 @default.
• W101795514 hasPrimaryLocation W1017955141 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W1501032035 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2131621323 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2133019678 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2139931444 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2181532768 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2183192489 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2183222845 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2200629628 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2214010455 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2340866294 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2548791205 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2609748155 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2611998259 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2904241177 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W2979123852 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W3030636052 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W3091865217 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W3115207445 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W3176241722 @default.
• W101795514 hasRelatedWork W53714771 @default.
• W101795514 isParatext "false" @default.
• W101795514 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W101795514 magId "101795514" @default.
• W101795514 workType "dissertation" @default.