Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W102180568> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W102180568 endingPage "1558" @default.
- W102180568 startingPage "1558" @default.
- W102180568 abstract "Editor—Kessler et al found that doctors detected psychiatric illness in less than half of patients scoring highly on the general health questionnaire (85% of patients with a normalising attributional style and 38% with a psychologising style were not detected).1 These data are in accordance with the work that we did in four Spanish primary care centres. Using the general health questionnaire-28 in the first part of the study and a SCAN interview2,3 in the second, we found similar figures of non-recognition of psychiatric illness4 and the same relevance of somatisation to lower rates of recognition of mental illness by general practitioners.5In her commentary on the paper Heath doubts that scoring highly on the general health questionnaire could be equated with having a treatable disorder. We agree with her that the general health questionnaire is a screening questionnaire, not a diagnostic tool, and that doctors should not talk of depression and anxiety just because patients scored highly on the questionnaire. But Kessler et al’s findings are relevant. Questionnaires such as the general health questionnaire provide an approximation of the rate of well defined psychiatric illness in primary care. The diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness by general practitioners are usually based on a suspicion about mental illness rather than on diagnostic criteria according to current nosology.In an attempt to analyse this issue we repeated the analysis of our data only for those with a definite affective or anxiety disorder. In our published study we collected data on patterns of symptom presentation (“attributional style”—physical, psychologising, and mixed symptoms). Among the (unweighted) 72 patients with these diagnoses as defined in the international classification of diseases, 10th revision (18 depression, 12 dysthymia, 2 cyclothymia, 3 panic disorder, 31 generalised anxiety disorder, 2 obsessive-compulsive disorder, 4 phobic anxiety), only 11 (23%) of the 47 with somatising attributions were recognised by their general practitioner as having affective or anxiety disorder. Equivalent figures were 93% (14/15) of the psychologising attributions group and 90% (9/10) of the “mixed” group.We also performed a logistic regression, with recognition of psychiatric caseness by the general practitioner as a dependent variable; symptom attribution and marital status were included as significant variables influencing recognition by the general practitioner. Patients with psychologising and mixed style attributions were more likely to be detected by general practitioners (table), as were married and previously married patients. Thus our results support the relevance of attributional style in patients with well defined depressive and anxiety disorders, for whom effective treatments exist." @default.
- W102180568 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W102180568 creator A5002936880 @default.
- W102180568 creator A5003821828 @default.
- W102180568 creator A5027471452 @default.
- W102180568 date "1999-06-05" @default.
- W102180568 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W102180568 title "Recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care" @default.
- W102180568 cites W1578163546 @default.
- W102180568 cites W2020737848 @default.
- W102180568 cites W2081023809 @default.
- W102180568 cites W2084865691 @default.
- W102180568 cites W2416641735 @default.
- W102180568 cites W2464914872 @default.
- W102180568 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1558" @default.
- W102180568 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1115924" @default.
- W102180568 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10438209" @default.
- W102180568 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W102180568 type Work @default.
- W102180568 sameAs 102180568 @default.
- W102180568 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682013 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682014 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682015 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682018 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682019 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682020 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682021 @default.
- W102180568 countsByYear W1021805682023 @default.
- W102180568 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W102180568 hasAuthorship W102180568A5002936880 @default.
- W102180568 hasAuthorship W102180568A5003821828 @default.
- W102180568 hasAuthorship W102180568A5027471452 @default.
- W102180568 hasBestOaLocation W1021805682 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C2776867660 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C2777977315 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C2984752397 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
- W102180568 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C118552586 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C121332964 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C1276947 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C136764020 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C139719470 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C162324750 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C2522767166 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C2776867660 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C2777977315 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C2984752397 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C41008148 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C512399662 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C558461103 @default.
- W102180568 hasConceptScore W102180568C71924100 @default.
- W102180568 hasIssue "7197" @default.
- W102180568 hasLocation W1021805681 @default.
- W102180568 hasLocation W1021805682 @default.
- W102180568 hasLocation W1021805683 @default.
- W102180568 hasOpenAccess W102180568 @default.
- W102180568 hasPrimaryLocation W1021805681 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W1575732798 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W1981065997 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W1983513655 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W2089364238 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W2149733294 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W2168601525 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W2378173657 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W2949989742 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W2951049161 @default.
- W102180568 hasRelatedWork W4206750615 @default.
- W102180568 hasVolume "318" @default.
- W102180568 isParatext "false" @default.
- W102180568 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W102180568 magId "102180568" @default.
- W102180568 workType "article" @default.