FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1031528504> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1031528504 abstract "Human rights advocates and scholars have witnessed great normative development in field of international women’s human rights in recent decades. Several international bodies -- among them, Committee on Elimination of Violence Against Women, European Court of Human Rights, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, and Inter-American Commission on Human Rights -- have found that gender-based violence, including domestic violence, can constitute impermissible discrimination under international law. International treaties and jurisprudence have begun to recognize that such discrimination can take on multiple or intersectional forms when it affects marginalized populations, such as indigenous, poor, or minority women and girls. Sexual orientation and gender identity have been found to be protected classes under international law, and sexual violence has been found to be a form of torture when perpetrated by state agents. International human rights bodies have also examined question of how states might best respond to structural discrimination and stereotypes, and have incorporated their conclusions into comprehensive reparations orders. These bodies have begun to comprehensively examine concept of state duty to act with due diligence necessary to prevent, protect, investigate, sanction, and offer reparations in cases of violence against women and discrimination perpetrated by state and non-state actors, particularly in a context where these problems are pervasive and impunity is norm. The development of these standards marks great progress for international women’s human rights movement. While normative development remains an ever-present and evolving goal, greatest challenge today’s movement faces is that of implementation -- that is, the process of putting international commitments into practice. The efficacy, authority, and credibility of an international court or human rights body, it has been noted, are measured principally by implementation of its judgments and other opinions resembling jurisprudence. In this essay, I explore normative developments in landmark Cotton Field case before Inter-American Court of Human Rights -- developments envisioned and championed by Professor Rhonda Copelon, brilliant scholar and human rights champion, among others -- and describe Copelon’s vision for how those norms might be put into place in Mexico. I then briefly summarize state of implementation of court’s decision and offer closing thoughts on road ahead. As I discuss, challenges of domestic implementation remain abundant, though important steps have been taken in a positive direction." @default.
• W1031528504 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1031528504 creator A5091080959 @default.
• W1031528504 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1031528504 modified "2023-10-08" @default.
• W1031528504 title "The Challenge of Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Law in the Cotton Field Case" @default.
• W1031528504 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1031528504 type Work @default.
• W1031528504 sameAs 1031528504 @default.
• W1031528504 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1031528504 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1031528504 hasAuthorship W1031528504A5091080959 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C22299250 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C2777996642 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C2778698251 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C2780224667 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C544040105 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConcept C86615163 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C144024400 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C169437150 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C17744445 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C185436325 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C199539241 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C22299250 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C2777996642 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C2778698251 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C2780224667 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C544040105 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C55447825 @default.
• W1031528504 hasConceptScore W1031528504C86615163 @default.
• W1031528504 hasLocation W10315285041 @default.
• W1031528504 hasOpenAccess W1031528504 @default.
• W1031528504 hasPrimaryLocation W10315285041 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1482026638 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1549024762 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1581373217 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1592892975 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1598219901 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1857884889 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W1935378401 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W2245381040 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W2247617461 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W2256719065 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W2303265657 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W2340475976 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3045948778 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3121602066 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3122025927 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3122564661 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3124900102 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3124967488 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W342174688 @default.
• W1031528504 hasRelatedWork W3091807953 @default.
• W1031528504 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1031528504 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1031528504 magId "1031528504" @default.
• W1031528504 workType "article" @default.