FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W104116655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W104116655 endingPage "523" @default.
• W104116655 startingPage "523" @default.
• W104116655 abstract "Nowadays, for educational evaluation, the tests more used constitute no doubt one of the instruments for the valuation of aptitudes or of knowledge. In the last years a new generation of tests has born, the Computerized Adaptive Tests (CAT), which they represent without any doubt one of the best alternatives as tools of evaluation of the acquired knowledge. Not uselessly, it is said of them that they constitute one of the most important revolutions of last years in the psychological and educational evaluation. Inside the current frame of the education, in which the European Higher Education Area pleads for a tutorship teaching-learning process, the process of development of the new methods of evaluation of the acquired knowledge it has a special relevancy. However, in spite of these loable objectives, it seems a contradiction to combine this new teaching-learning model and the overcrowded students’ assessment. Therefore, having at one’s disposal assessment instruments adapted to this tutored teaching would be advisable, or, in other words, personalized or made-to-measure knowledge assessment tools, appropriate to a teaching method that expects student autonomy. In short, a quality higher education requires a flexible, fast and efficient evaluation system. This way, by means of new methodological, technological and computer components, CATs give response to the educational specific needs both of persons and groups. From this new educational paradigm, we propose to use a procedure of measurement based on CATs that allows the evaluation of knowledge about Psychology Students including an example. Objective: To use a CAT for assessing psychometrics knowledge instead of classical pen-and-pencil test. Subjects: a sample of 66 students of third course of Psychology Grade at Miguel Hernandez University (74,2% women; 21,8+/ -4,3 years old). Procedure: Students were examined of Psychometrics at a computerized classroom by means of a CAT administered from an item bank of 254 items. Afterthat, they complete a survey about attitudes about CATs, that includes items like: At what extent do you... “...prefer knowledge assessment by means CATs opposite conventional paper-and-pencil exams?”, “...think CATs are useful, reliable, fast, interesting, and comfortable for students?”, “...think CATs are adequate in order to improving teaching quality?” and “...think CATs are appropriate for knowledge assessment at European Higher Education Area context?”. In all variables, response scale was from 0 to 10. Moreover, other academic variables were assessed. Results: Psychometric knowledge estimation were 1,02+/-0,53 and maximum Estimated standard error was 0,38. Regarding attitudes, students prefer CAT in front of papel-and -pencil exam (mean=6,14+/-2,4). Moreover, they think CATs are very useful (7,79+/ -1,3), reliable (7,74+/-1,7), fast (9,02+/-1,04), interesting (7,58+/-1,5), and comfortable (7,76+/-2,2) for students. In the same way, they appears like very appropriate for teaching quality (6,94+/-1,4) and for assessment at EHEA context (6,97+/-1.4). Conclusions: Results show that CATs are very friendly and students prefer them to classical assessment. This, together with the benefits that literature arises, like flexibility, adaptability and precision, turns them into one of the evaluation procedures of the University of Future." @default.
• W104116655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W104116655 creator A5027200161 @default.
• W104116655 creator A5067597483 @default.
• W104116655 creator A5075923429 @default.
• W104116655 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W104116655 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W104116655 title "COMPUTERIZED ADAPTATIVE TESTS: A NEW FRIENDLY AND EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE" @default.
• W104116655 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W104116655 type Work @default.
• W104116655 sameAs 104116655 @default.
• W104116655 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W104116655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W104116655 hasAuthorship W104116655A5027200161 @default.
• W104116655 hasAuthorship W104116655A5067597483 @default.
• W104116655 hasAuthorship W104116655A5075923429 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C186027771 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C188231857 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W104116655 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C10138342 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C111472728 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C111919701 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C138885662 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C145420912 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C154945302 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C15744967 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C162324750 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C17744445 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C186027771 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C188231857 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C199539241 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C2779530757 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C41008148 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C56739046 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C65414064 @default.
• W104116655 hasConceptScore W104116655C98045186 @default.
• W104116655 hasLocation W1041166551 @default.
• W104116655 hasOpenAccess W104116655 @default.
• W104116655 hasPrimaryLocation W1041166551 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W1535064734 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2013883227 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2058661968 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2182307005 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2184006986 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2399970998 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2462297751 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2694192897 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2742414118 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2760478784 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2948932723 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2963894730 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2992320130 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W328067175 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W611970653 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W66108809 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W1940132355 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2185295360 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2518391599 @default.
• W104116655 hasRelatedWork W2913994717 @default.
• W104116655 isParatext "false" @default.
• W104116655 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W104116655 magId "104116655" @default.
• W104116655 workType "article" @default.