Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W108357156> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W108357156 abstract "This article, part of a larger project analyzing how far public and private contracting arrangements can go in constraining democratic decision-making, examines whether the United States should be liable under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment when its actions have the effect of destroying or impairing private contract rights. In the Omnia Commercial case, decided 90 years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that private contract interests represent “property” within the meaning of the Takings Clause, and that the issue of whether such property has been “taken” should be resolved by assessing whether the government has “appropriated” the contract interest (resulting in a taking), or merely “frustrated” it (not resulting in a taking). While Omnia Commercial reflects a sound intuition that private contract interests deserve special treatment under the Takings Clause, the appropriation versus frustration standard has no principled foundation and is irreconcilable with modern takings standards. In place of the Omnia Commercial standard, this article suggests that the Court should adopt a two-part analysis. First, rather than treating all private contract interests as a form of “property,” the Court should only treat the direct contractual commitments between the parties as property; as a result, only when the government inserts itself into the parties’ contractual relations, by taking over the contract benefits of one of the parties, or by transferring the benefits to some new party, has the government impinged on “property” in a fashion that can potentially support a taking claim. Second, the Court should rule that a government action impinging on contract-based property does not result in a taking when the action imposes no net economic loss on the contracting parties, considered together as a single unit; this approach would require the parties to allocate between themselves the burden, if any, a government action has imposed on either one of them. On the other hand, the Court should rule that, when government interference with contract-based property does produce a net loss to the contracting parties, considered as a unit, a finding of a taking generally will be warranted under a traditional appropriation analysis." @default.
- W108357156 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W108357156 creator A5017998676 @default.
- W108357156 date "2011-03-12" @default.
- W108357156 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W108357156 title "Public Takings of Private Contracts" @default.
- W108357156 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W108357156 type Work @default.
- W108357156 sameAs 108357156 @default.
- W108357156 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W108357156 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W108357156 hasAuthorship W108357156A5017998676 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C2776931063 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C2777538416 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C2777828199 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C2779362956 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W108357156 hasConcept C86511162 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C138885662 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C144133560 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C162324750 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C17744445 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C190253527 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C199539241 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C2776931063 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C2777538416 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C2777828199 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C2778137410 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C2778272461 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C2779362956 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C41895202 @default.
- W108357156 hasConceptScore W108357156C86511162 @default.
- W108357156 hasLocation W1083571561 @default.
- W108357156 hasOpenAccess W108357156 @default.
- W108357156 hasPrimaryLocation W1083571561 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1504432687 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1548936992 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1570917766 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1574665773 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1586682875 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1740902067 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W1994632936 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2052480686 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2227914619 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2237319980 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2287049146 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2359076707 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2414135312 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W2551701475 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W3041160330 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W3115204640 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W3122602526 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W3195476801 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W43373775 @default.
- W108357156 hasRelatedWork W44755126 @default.
- W108357156 isParatext "false" @default.
- W108357156 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W108357156 magId "108357156" @default.
- W108357156 workType "article" @default.