FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W113301794> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W113301794 abstract "BackgroundLifestyle surveys are traditionally used for collecting detailed population information aboutindividual behaviours that impact on health. However, declining response rates and theunder-representation of certain population groups in lifestyle survey data has led touncertainty over the accuracy of any findings. In order to maximise response rates, amixed-methods approach is now recommended. This review was carried out in order toexamine the methodological literature related to the administration of lifestyle surveys andthe implications for response rates. It was envisaged that the results of this review couldprovide a valuable resource for those involved in undertaking lifestyle surveys.MethodsA review of the empirical evidence and published literature on the methodologicalconsiderations associated with administration of lifestyle surveys, specifically in relation tomaximising response rates, was carried out. A search for ‘grey literature’ was alsoconducted using the internet, and citation tracking was performed on all retrieved articles.A request for examples of relevant lifestyle survey work, particularly those incorporatingmixed-methods designs and/or strategies to increase response rates, was distributed toseveral Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) across England. The responses are illustrated as‘good practice’ case studies.ResultsThe postal questionnaire remains an important lifestyle survey tool, but response rateshave decreased rapidly in recent years. Interviews and telephone surveys arerecommended in order to supplement data from postal questionnaires to overcome anyliteracy and language barriers. These approaches are advocated to increase responserates in some population groups, but costs may be prohibitive. Electronic surveys are acheaper alternative, but the evidence seems to suggest that the use of the internet doesnot appear to increase overall response rates to surveys. Evidence on the use ofincentives suggests they can be effective at increasing response rates, but only if their useis tailored to the design of the survey and to the characteristics of target populations.ConclusionsThe empirical evidence was not robust enough to make definitive recommendations, butinformation from the published literature, along with examples of ‘good practice’ in lifestylesurvey work suggests that supplementing, or offering different survey modes, alongsidetargeted maximisation strategies can increase coverage and also, with careful planning,can prove to be cost-effective." @default.
• W113301794 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W113301794 creator A5026739364 @default.
• W113301794 creator A5061875757 @default.
• W113301794 date "2009-09-01" @default.
• W113301794 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W113301794 title "Increasing response rates to lifestyle surveys: a review of methodology and 'good practice'." @default.
• W113301794 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W113301794 type Work @default.
• W113301794 sameAs 113301794 @default.
• W113301794 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W113301794 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W113301794 hasAuthorship W113301794A5026739364 @default.
• W113301794 hasAuthorship W113301794A5061875757 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W113301794 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C136764020 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C2778805511 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C2908647359 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C41008148 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C71924100 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C74909509 @default.
• W113301794 hasConceptScore W113301794C99454951 @default.
• W113301794 hasLocation W1133017941 @default.
• W113301794 hasOpenAccess W113301794 @default.
• W113301794 hasPrimaryLocation W1133017941 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W1256295487 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W154595869 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W1567521167 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2024528575 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2048685680 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2059567293 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2081056739 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2082583641 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2106294682 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2108262335 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2125658462 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2144393059 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2177902262 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2180282691 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2253356284 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2267041337 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2471605275 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2896834188 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W2907760065 @default.
• W113301794 hasRelatedWork W311059266 @default.
• W113301794 isParatext "false" @default.
• W113301794 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W113301794 magId "113301794" @default.
• W113301794 workType "article" @default.