FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1136996814> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1136996814 endingPage "18" @default.
• W1136996814 startingPage "7" @default.
• W1136996814 abstract "Abstract. Considering phenomenon of inter-institutional collaboration, the paper aims to investigate the issues of inter-institutional collaboration in Lithuanian public organizations. The paper is based on the study of collaboration aspects relevant to the project implemented by the Lithuanian Republic Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Based on theoretical discussion related to the success of project implementation and team work, two studies were conducted. Firstly, a sample comprised of seven project managers expressed the assumptions about decision-making process, obstacles of project implementation and measures for efficiency. Secondly, 65 responses were collected from project participants representing different public institutions. The results revealed that inter-institutional projects in public organizations are still characterized as following traditional and strictly hierarchic structure. The project leaders underestimate the potential of project group members and do not involve them into the decision-making process. The findings let us develop recommendations for managers and policy makers involved into inter-institutional projects.Keywords: inter-institutional collaboration, project, team work, success factors, decision making, leadershipJEL Classification: M1, M12, M19IntroductionInter-institutional collaboration has become an increasingly prevalent phenomenon in contemporary world. Some forms of collaboration have emerged in business and have gained popularity in particular industries such as: ship building (Ahola et al. 2008), film-making (Bechky 2006) and etc. Inter-institutional collaboration requires combining efforts of different organizations by implementing various projects in a limited time period. Hence, temporary nature of collaboration is a distinguished feature impacting interaction process. However, prevailing discussions revealed that inter-institutional collaboration is slow process and provides mixed results (Levering et al. 2013).Public organizations are confronted with the growing pressure to integrate and increase quality of services while lowering costs (Drach-Zahavy 2011). Corresponding to these pressures organizations aim to apply approaches prevailing in business field. Hence, inter-institutional projects have been gaining considerable attention of managers and policy makers in such fields as: health sector (Jones et al. 2004) and higher education (Tadaki, Tremewan 2013). Collaboration is mainly based on five pillars: prevailing common goals, reciprocal trust, and exchange of information, share of resources and capabilities and share of risks (Raisiene, 2011). The barriers to effective collaboration include mistrust, different priorities of organizations, different values and goals (Palinkas et al. 2014).Notably, collaboration of organizations requires considerable efforts of various teams. However, effectiveness of teamwork is seen as a challenge, impacted by increasingly complex and innovative tasks and environmental disruptions (Harvey et al. 2014). In addition, inter-organizational teams are confronted with even more complex problems than organizational teams. Collaboration issues in public sector arise due to traditional hierarchical command and control structures and the need to coordinate across organizational boundaries (Piercy et al. 2013). Hence, decision-making process becomes complex and impacts interaction of various stakeholders.The paper aims to investigate the issues of inter-institutional collaboration in Lithuanian public organizations. The paper is based on the study of collaboration aspects relevant to the project implemented by the Lithuanian Republic Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) in 20122013. The research is grounded on the survey of 84 project participants representing different public institutions and interviews of project managers.The remaining of paper is organized as follows. The first part provides insights into the success of project implementation. …" @default.
• W1136996814 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1136996814 creator A5041128235 @default.
• W1136996814 creator A5073254352 @default.
• W1136996814 creator A5079270720 @default.
• W1136996814 date "2015-05-20" @default.
• W1136996814 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W1136996814 title "How do inter-institutional teams succeed? A case of national project" @default.
• W1136996814 cites W136013114 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1570599663 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1598568614 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1973964490 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1981583718 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1990569908 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1992337585 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1994072696 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W1995328083 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2020924661 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2034377441 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2038943531 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2044091975 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2047347850 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2050464301 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2050902273 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2060963772 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2078261331 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2078984265 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2087822077 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2121438740 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2128483484 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2131480726 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2133562772 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2164138091 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2168290613 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W2810451685 @default.
• W1136996814 cites W57474900 @default.
• W1136996814 doi "https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2015/8-1/1" @default.
• W1136996814 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1136996814 type Work @default.
• W1136996814 sameAs 1136996814 @default.
• W1136996814 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1136996814 countsByYear W11369968142015 @default.
• W1136996814 countsByYear W11369968142017 @default.
• W1136996814 countsByYear W11369968142018 @default.
• W1136996814 countsByYear W11369968142020 @default.
• W1136996814 countsByYear W11369968142022 @default.
• W1136996814 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1136996814 hasAuthorship W1136996814A5041128235 @default.
• W1136996814 hasAuthorship W1136996814A5073254352 @default.
• W1136996814 hasAuthorship W1136996814A5079270720 @default.
• W1136996814 hasBestOaLocation W11369968141 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConceptScore W1136996814C144133560 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConceptScore W1136996814C195094911 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConceptScore W1136996814C41008148 @default.
• W1136996814 hasConceptScore W1136996814C56739046 @default.
• W1136996814 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1136996814 hasLocation W11369968141 @default.
• W1136996814 hasLocation W11369968142 @default.
• W1136996814 hasOpenAccess W1136996814 @default.
• W1136996814 hasPrimaryLocation W11369968141 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W1491839574 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W2011945577 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W2596173151 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W2624733068 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W2765153054 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W2931838652 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W3080576469 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W3168296622 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W4231340554 @default.
• W1136996814 hasRelatedWork W2051331738 @default.
• W1136996814 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W1136996814 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1136996814 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1136996814 magId "1136996814" @default.
• W1136996814 workType "article" @default.