Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1146308596> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 60 of
60
with 100 items per page.
- W1146308596 endingPage "3428" @default.
- W1146308596 startingPage "3428" @default.
- W1146308596 abstract "Purpose: To investigate the treatment plan quality between two treatment planning systems (TPS) for volumetric modulated Arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: VMAT plans based on Varian Eclipse (Ver10.0) and Philips Pinnacle (Ver9.10) TPS were respectively generated by 10 cervical cancer patients by using 2, 3 arcs, controlling the gantry movement with the space of 2 degrees and setting the same optimization constraint as soon as possible. The delivery system with VMAT was Varian Clinac iX machine. The prescription dose was 50Gy/23f for regions at high risk (PTV1), and 45Gy/23f for regions at low risk (PTV). The difference of treatment plans was evaluated by dose distribution and delivery efficiency. Results: The VMAT 2-arcs plans based on Pinnacle in the conformal indexes of PTV(CI: 0.77±0.05 vs 0.75±0.02, p>0.05), and OARs (such as V30, V40 of rectum and bladder) showed slightly better than those of Eclipse TPS, and the homogeneity indexes (HI) of in Pinnacle were slightly worse than the Eclipse (PTV: 0.17±0.01 vs 0.14±0.01, p <0.05; PTV1: 0.06±0.01 vs 0.04±0.002, p <0.05), there were statistical difference. The MUs with 2-arcs (750±91 vs 1118±84, p <0.05) and 3-arcs (837±86 vs 1215±208, p <0.05) of the Eclipse plans had a clear advantages over the Pinnacle ones, with the statistical difference. The 3-arc plans in Eclipse showed an advantage over the 2-arcs ones and the plan quality of 3-arcs in Pinnacle had no advantage comparing with 2 arcs, but the MUs of 3 Arcs in both Eclipse (837±86 vs 750±92, p <0.05) and Pinnacle (1215±208 vs 1118±84, p >0.05) were more than those of 2-arcs. Conclusion: For patients with cervical cancer, the VMAT treatment plans of two TPSs could achieve clinical acceptable dose distribution. However, we will still need more cases to further study and determine the optimization and performance characteristics of the two commercial TPSs." @default.
- W1146308596 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1146308596 creator A5018590294 @default.
- W1146308596 creator A5029203166 @default.
- W1146308596 creator A5040347916 @default.
- W1146308596 creator A5063652190 @default.
- W1146308596 creator A5073221601 @default.
- W1146308596 date "2015-06-01" @default.
- W1146308596 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1146308596 title "SU-E-T-411: Evaluation of Treatment Plan Quality Between Two Treatment Planning Systems for VMAT" @default.
- W1146308596 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4924772" @default.
- W1146308596 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W1146308596 type Work @default.
- W1146308596 sameAs 1146308596 @default.
- W1146308596 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1146308596 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1146308596 hasAuthorship W1146308596A5018590294 @default.
- W1146308596 hasAuthorship W1146308596A5029203166 @default.
- W1146308596 hasAuthorship W1146308596A5040347916 @default.
- W1146308596 hasAuthorship W1146308596A5063652190 @default.
- W1146308596 hasAuthorship W1146308596A5073221601 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C2776017024 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C2778505590 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C121332964 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C1276947 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C141071460 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C201645570 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C2776017024 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C2778505590 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C2989005 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C509974204 @default.
- W1146308596 hasConceptScore W1146308596C71924100 @default.
- W1146308596 hasIssue "6Part18" @default.
- W1146308596 hasLocation W11463085961 @default.
- W1146308596 hasOpenAccess W1146308596 @default.
- W1146308596 hasPrimaryLocation W11463085961 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W1161774306 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W1999946850 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W2004482917 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W2011462344 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W2051708390 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W2057734384 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W2468408250 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W2471848632 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W3022810835 @default.
- W1146308596 hasRelatedWork W3043106107 @default.
- W1146308596 hasVolume "42" @default.
- W1146308596 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1146308596 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1146308596 magId "1146308596" @default.
- W1146308596 workType "article" @default.