FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W118427463> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W118427463 abstract "Mathews v. Eldridge, which addresses the procedures that must be provided for deprivations of life, liberty, or property under the Due Process Clauses, and Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, which guides inquiry into when governmental regulations rise to the level of takings of property that require just compensation, are decisions with near-canonical status. Mathews and Penn Central have some noteworthy parallels. Each decision is widely regarded as prescribing a three-factor test for resolving questions that arise under its respective domain. Each decision is almost universally decried as unworkable, incomplete, subjective, and incapable of consistent application. And each decision is, we think, largely misunderstood. In this article, we demonstrate that neither the Mathews nor Penn Central decisions actually set forth tests - much less three-factor tests - for resolving issues. Rather, each decision had the far more modest, but nonetheless important, goal of providing a common language for lawyers and judges to employ when conducting inquiries about constitutional procedures or regulatory takings, both of which are doctrinally oriented around a search for basic fairness. The decisions do no more, and no less, than to provide a framework within which issues of fairness can be explored and discussed through the formal, stylized channels of an adversarial legal system. We show that the so-called Mathews test was not the creation of the Supreme Court; it was constructed by the Solicitor General's office, and endorsed by the AFL-CIO as amicus for Eldridge, as a way of focusing attention on key features of procedural fairness that had specific relevance to the facts in Mathews. The Penn Central Court similarly gave no indication that it was prescribing any kind of decision-making methodology, and it identified only two basic factors - the impact on property owners and the character of the governmental action - that bore on the regulatory takings inquiry. Subsequent decisions and commentators have often treated these frameworks as actual vehicles for decision-making, but that is neither sensible nor faithful to the frameworks' original conceptions. Once Mathews and Penn Central are properly understood as vehicles for shaping dialogue about fundamental fairness, they make a good measure of jurisprudential sense, especially if the Penn Central framework in particular is reconstructed to conform more closely to its original model. Accordingly, we propose some modest clarifications to the Penn Central framework that better allow it to serve its true conversation-shaping function." @default.
• W118427463 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W118427463 creator A5006711953 @default.
• W118427463 creator A5034221375 @default.
• W118427463 creator A5038833232 @default.
• W118427463 date "2005-06-23" @default.
• W118427463 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W118427463 title "'Oh Lord, Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood!': Rediscovering the Mathews v. Eldridge and Penn Central Frameworks" @default.
• W118427463 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W118427463 type Work @default.
• W118427463 sameAs 118427463 @default.
• W118427463 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W118427463 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W118427463 hasAuthorship W118427463A5006711953 @default.
• W118427463 hasAuthorship W118427463A5034221375 @default.
• W118427463 hasAuthorship W118427463A5038833232 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C2775922551 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C2777828199 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C2779362956 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C37736160 @default.
• W118427463 hasConcept C38935604 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C139719470 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C144024400 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C162324750 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C17744445 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C190253527 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C199539241 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C21547014 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C2775922551 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C2777828199 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C2778272461 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C2779362956 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C37736160 @default.
• W118427463 hasConceptScore W118427463C38935604 @default.
• W118427463 hasLocation W1184274631 @default.
• W118427463 hasOpenAccess W118427463 @default.
• W118427463 hasPrimaryLocation W1184274631 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W1494266307 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W1517626020 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W1547901662 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W1573234990 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W1590309525 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W167709108 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W280655618 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W2889660193 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W304861907 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W3121137168 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W3121457228 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W3122539648 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W3125846198 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W321381592 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W325317494 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W328902606 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W343239670 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W75119202 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W208385589 @default.
• W118427463 hasRelatedWork W3140119945 @default.
• W118427463 isParatext "false" @default.
• W118427463 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W118427463 magId "118427463" @default.
• W118427463 workType "article" @default.