FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W120143243> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W120143243 startingPage "653" @default.
• W120143243 abstract "I. ARGENTINA: 1983-2006 II. SOUTH KOREA: SETTLING AND RECONSTRUCTING THE PAST: 1945-2006 III. DELAYED JUSTICE: A MECHANISM FOR TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IV. DUTY TO PROSECUTE V. LEGAL JUSTIFICATION FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH DUTY TO PROSECUTE VI. DELAYED JUSTICE AND THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS VII. RECONCILIATION VIII. RULE OF LAW IX. INSTITUTIONAL REFORM X. MEMORY XI. GUILT XII. CONCLUSION Transitional Justice has been understood as a range of approaches to deal with widespread and systematic human rights abuses existing in a past regime as a new regime emerges in pursuit of peace and democracy. (1) With an increasing number of states experiencing these kinds of transitions in diverse ways, (2) the need for an innovative and flexible approach and an expansive conceptualization of Transitional Justice has inspired a range of research initiatives. To date, one of the main debates in Transitional Justice has been whether a new regime ought to punish widespread and systematic human rights abusers from the past regime after a recent transition to a new democratic regime. (3) However, in some fundamental sense, this debate may be misplaced, because it is not so much whether one ought to punish but that one cannot punish in an overwhelming majority of cases, either in domestic or international judicial bodies. Hence, this Article seeks to present Delayed Justice as a useful mechanism of Transitional Justice. Notwithstanding the potential benefits emanating from bringing immediate legal prosecution and justice to past human rights abusers, it may be better to defer legal prosecution and remedy for a lengthy period while the new regime is established. To promote this Delayed Justice approach, this Article seeks to support a broad assertion about the discourse of Transitional Justice: that Transitional Justice is a long-term project that ought to shift its focus beyond civil and political human rights. In the same vein, Delayed Justice is presented as an integrated, comprehensive, and localized approach to Transitional Justice. There are a few clarifications to be made beforehand. First, since each transitional case is different and unique, Delayed Justice is presented merely as an available, useful approach to Transitional Justice--not a one-size-fits-all solution. This Article seeks to present an alternative view to the narrow dichotomic debate of prosecution versus forgetting and amnesty immediately after the transition to a new regime. Second, the narratives about Argentina and South Korea that follow in no way reveal all dimensions of the events and dilemmas involved in the respective countries. It inevitably presents a skewed image and story based on this subjective selection. Yet, hopefully readers may benefit by extracting at least sketchy descriptions. Third, these two countries are not chosen as case studies to compare one against the other. Rather, this Article seeks to provide some reflections on theoretical insight into a situation where justice strikes back after its absence for several decades, and these two countries may provide useful mirrors for such reflections to be cast. This Article will briefly describe situations in Argentina and South Korea where criminal and civil justice are being pursued following several decades without legal accountability. The descriptions will be followed by an analysis of the benefits of Delayed Justice over immediate legal prosecution and recourse. Then, a series of issues ranging from international law to social consideration, such as guilt and memory, will be examined to deduce arguments for and against Delayed Justice as a useful mechanism of Transitional Justice. I. ARGENTINA: 1983-2006 Argentina's guerra sucia, or Dirty War, which spanned from 1976 to 1983 under a military junta government, left a minimum of 8,961 persons dead or disappeared. (4) Furthermore, tens of thousands of Argentines were detained without being charged with specific crimes. …" @default.
• W120143243 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W120143243 creator A5020327786 @default.
• W120143243 date "2008-06-22" @default.
• W120143243 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W120143243 title "Transitional Justice: When Justice Strikes Back - Case Studies of Delayed Justice in Argentina and South Korea" @default.
• W120143243 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W120143243 type Work @default.
• W120143243 sameAs 120143243 @default.
• W120143243 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W120143243 countsByYear W1201432432013 @default.
• W120143243 countsByYear W1201432432014 @default.
• W120143243 countsByYear W1201432432018 @default.
• W120143243 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W120143243 hasAuthorship W120143243A5020327786 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C110928126 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C2776847301 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C2779621654 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C2780502288 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C30407753 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W120143243 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C110928126 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C139621336 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C144024400 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C159985019 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C169437150 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C17744445 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C190253527 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C192562407 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C199539241 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C2776847301 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C2779103253 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C2779621654 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C2780502288 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C30407753 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C555826173 @default.
• W120143243 hasConceptScore W120143243C94625758 @default.
• W120143243 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W120143243 hasLocation W1201432431 @default.
• W120143243 hasOpenAccess W120143243 @default.
• W120143243 hasPrimaryLocation W1201432431 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W1515498937 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W1547236334 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W1711445158 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2008979152 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2122610386 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2159127847 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2179308000 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2182743187 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2224747588 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2286120456 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2293124700 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2295606990 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2343783639 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2477944046 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2955564732 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W2985041371 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W3164816244 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W3183892624 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W343768549 @default.
• W120143243 hasRelatedWork W608241671 @default.
• W120143243 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W120143243 isParatext "false" @default.
• W120143243 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W120143243 magId "120143243" @default.
• W120143243 workType "article" @default.