Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W123541726> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W123541726 startingPage "1557" @default.
- W123541726 abstract "The division of Native American reservations into individually owned parcels was an unquestionable disaster. Authorized by the General Allotment Act of 1887, allotment cost Indians two-thirds of their land and left much of the remainder effectively useless as it passed to successive generations of owners. The conventional understanding, shared by scholars, judges, policymakers, and activists alike, has been that allotment failed because it imposed individual ownership on people who had never known private property. Before so this story goes, Indians had always owned their land in common. Because Indians had no conception of private property, they were unable to adjust to the culture of private land rights and were easy targets for non-Indians anxious to acquire their land. Professor Bobroff argues that this story is wrong. Attempting to draw on often ignored Indian voices and considering anthropological and historical accounts, he reviews evidence that before allotment and continuing on reservations today, Native American societies have had a wide range of property systems. These native property systems vary across climates, resources, cultures, and historical periods, but many have recognized private property rights in land. Bobroff argues that allotment failed not because Indians had never known private property, but because it imposed a single dysfunctional property system on all Indian tribes and prohibited those tribes from changing it. Once an Indian reservation was allotted, tribal property laws were replaced and could no longer evolve. They could only be changed, quite literally, by an act of Congress. This insight into allotment is important because it suggests that the solution to the problem of highly fractionated Indian land titles is neither, as previous reforms attempted, to return all allotted land to tribal ownership nor to remove all restrictions from allotted lands. Rather, the solution lies with tribes and allotment owners reestablishing functional property systems that allow efficient use and rational inheritance of allotted lands. Having created the monster of allotment in 1887, it is only fair that Congress should provide resources and assistance to help tribal property systems succeed. IMAGE FORMULA9 I. INTRODUCTION When Congress authorized the division of Indian reservations into individual tracts in 1887, the indigenous peoples of what is now the United States had already lost more than 90 percent of their land.2 Advocates for allotment, as the 1887 policy was IMAGE FORMULA12 known, told a compelling story to justify partitioning the Indians' remaining 138 million acres. The advocates' story was that Indians needed private property in order to join American society. As long as Indians continued to hold their lands in common, so the story went, they could never know the benefits of civilization. Without the security of private property and the progress it would bring, they would be crushed by the irresistible tide of white settlement.3 Without allotment and assimilation, the reformers asserted, Indians were doomed to extermination. Today, a very different story is told about allotment. Scholars, bureaucrats, judges, and activists, Indian and non-Indian alike, agree that the policy devastated Indian societies.4 By 1934, when the Federal government ended the policy had cost Indians almost 90 million acres, two-thirds of the land they owned fifty years earlier.5 Allotment had wreaked havoc in Indian communities and eviscerated tribal governments. Indians survived, but Indian Country has never recovered. Allotment failed, this modern story goes, because it attempted to impose private property on indigenous peoples who had no conception of the private ownership of lands When Indians went from holding their land communally to owning it individually, they had few defenses against those anxious to gain IMAGE FORMULA14 control of Indian lands. …" @default.
- W123541726 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W123541726 creator A5064175095 @default.
- W123541726 date "2001-05-01" @default.
- W123541726 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W123541726 title "Retelling Allotment: Indian Property Rights and the Myth of Common Ownership" @default.
- W123541726 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W123541726 type Work @default.
- W123541726 sameAs 123541726 @default.
- W123541726 citedByCount "12" @default.
- W123541726 countsByYear W1235417262013 @default.
- W123541726 countsByYear W1235417262014 @default.
- W123541726 countsByYear W1235417262015 @default.
- W123541726 countsByYear W1235417262016 @default.
- W123541726 countsByYear W1235417262020 @default.
- W123541726 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W123541726 hasAuthorship W123541726A5064175095 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C137607661 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C189950617 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C2775999810 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C2777538416 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C2777632111 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C542127796 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C74892257 @default.
- W123541726 hasConcept C86511162 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C111472728 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C118518473 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C137607661 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C138885662 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C144024400 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C144133560 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C162324750 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C166957645 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C17744445 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C189950617 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C190253527 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C199539241 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C205649164 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C2775999810 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C2777538416 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C2777632111 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C34447519 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C542127796 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C74892257 @default.
- W123541726 hasConceptScore W123541726C86511162 @default.
- W123541726 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W123541726 hasLocation W1235417261 @default.
- W123541726 hasOpenAccess W123541726 @default.
- W123541726 hasPrimaryLocation W1235417261 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W1518001679 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W1536322016 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W1978854673 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2012520709 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2017824063 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2056153279 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2074061242 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2141902724 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W227134179 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2313340566 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2327232376 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W232965647 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2330286457 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2333366084 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2334986648 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2482146877 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W2503252027 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W273974347 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W338418057 @default.
- W123541726 hasRelatedWork W760526725 @default.
- W123541726 hasVolume "54" @default.
- W123541726 isParatext "false" @default.
- W123541726 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W123541726 magId "123541726" @default.
- W123541726 workType "article" @default.