Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W126202954> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W126202954 endingPage "501" @default.
- W126202954 startingPage "495" @default.
- W126202954 abstract "Achieving reproducible results with the skin prick test method depends on a certain amount of experience, the depth of skin penetration by the device which is used and reducing the number of false positive reactions caused by contamination of the device by allergen extract previously pricked. The aim of the study was to compare the results of SPT performed with single puncture device using lancet or injection needle with multiple puncture device using the same needle wiped in alcohol between pricks.Twenty adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis with known sensitivity to grass pollen allergen and ten control subjects entered the study. SPT were applied to the volar surface of both forearms on two separate visits during which fixed sequence of pricking histamine, allergen and saline solutions (Allergopharma, Reinbeck, Germany) was maintained. On the first visit new device was used for each prick: injection needles on one forearm and lancets on the other. On a second visit (after a wash-out period of 4 weeks) injection needle changed between each prick on one forearm was compared with using the same needle wiped in alcohol between pricks on the other forearm.There was no statistical difference between the three tested methods for the size of wheel to histamine (p = 0.5), saline (p = 1) and allergen (p = 0.54) in group of SAR patients as well as for the size of wheel to histamine (p = 0.41) and saline (p = 1) in control subjects. Analysis of wheel diameters for histamine and allergen in group of SAR patients demonstrated comparable degrees of precision for all tested methods (CV%): there was no statistical difference between CV% achieved for the size of histamine (p = 0.73); as well as for allergen wheal (p = 0.32).The results of SPT achieved by using only one injection needle rinsed in alcohol for multiple pricks seem to have similar quality, being more economical than standard techniques in which puncture device is changed between each test." @default.
- W126202954 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W126202954 creator A5019763846 @default.
- W126202954 creator A5026834242 @default.
- W126202954 creator A5038566673 @default.
- W126202954 date "2008-06-01" @default.
- W126202954 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
- W126202954 title "[The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle]." @default.
- W126202954 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18702329" @default.
- W126202954 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W126202954 type Work @default.
- W126202954 sameAs 126202954 @default.
- W126202954 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W126202954 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W126202954 hasAuthorship W126202954A5019763846 @default.
- W126202954 hasAuthorship W126202954A5026834242 @default.
- W126202954 hasAuthorship W126202954A5038566673 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C1122143 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C207480886 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C2777397205 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C2780214079 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C2780510475 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W126202954 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C1122143 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C126322002 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C141071460 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C16005928 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C203014093 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C207480886 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C2777397205 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C2780214079 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C2780510475 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C42219234 @default.
- W126202954 hasConceptScore W126202954C71924100 @default.
- W126202954 hasIssue "144" @default.
- W126202954 hasLocation W1262029541 @default.
- W126202954 hasOpenAccess W126202954 @default.
- W126202954 hasPrimaryLocation W1262029541 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W1493609992 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W1980279270 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W1998544211 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W1999624280 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2021296980 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2032746508 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2055473257 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2133920139 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2146471677 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2354465588 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2355046903 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2377560462 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2381501147 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2393882305 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2402463510 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2404351726 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2405880948 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W2410527165 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W3024437608 @default.
- W126202954 hasRelatedWork W37017993 @default.
- W126202954 hasVolume "24" @default.
- W126202954 isParatext "false" @default.
- W126202954 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W126202954 magId "126202954" @default.
- W126202954 workType "article" @default.