FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W131933341> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W131933341 startingPage "157" @default.
• W131933341 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING THE TRUTH II. ADVERSARIAL AND INQUISITORIAL SYSTEMS: HISTORICAL FAILURES III. COMPROMISE SOLUTIONS IV. TRUTH AND THE JURY V. WHY CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH? VI. TOWARD A DEFINITION OF PROCEDURAL TRUTH I. INTRODUCTION: THE IMPORTANCE OF KNOWING THE TRUTH Finding the troth is a difficult task under any set of circumstances, but finding the truth in the context of crime and punishment is almost impossible. Even if we assume that an objective reality exists and that human beings are generally able to determine and to describe it in some adequate form so that we can reasonably distinguish between truth and falsehood, there is hardly an arrangement less likely than the criminal process to bring out the The reasons are obvious: crime is not something the culprit or the victim has reason to brag about (and if either does, he is unlikely to say the truth), and the impending consequences of an emergence of the truth are (at least for one party) quite unwelcome. The result is a strong incentive for passively or actively concealing relevant facts. The difficulty of determining the truth about crime stands in marked contrast with society's strong interest in doing so: crime, especially serious crime, disturbs the peace of the community and, if unresolved, raises the threat of repetition. Knowing exactly what has happened, who the culprit is, and why he committed the offense, is a necessary prerequisite for any attempt to re-establish social peace through justice. The determination of truth is indispensable for yet another reason--criminal sanctions are society's most severe expression of moral blame. (1) It is therefore imperative that criminal sanctions be imposed (only) upon those who are in fact guilty. II. ADVERSARIAL AND INQUISITORIAL SYSTEMS: HISTORICAL FAILURES The above-described dilemma explains why legal systems throughout history have struggled so hard to devise methods of getting at the truth in criminal matters. Traditionally, two basic approaches to resolving the problem of truth-finding have been distinguished: the adversarial system, which relies on opposing parties coming forward with their competing versions of the truth, challenging each other's accuracy, and thereby ultimately bringing about a composite picture of (or approximating) the truth; and the inquisitorial system, which entrusts an authoritative, neutral law officer with collecting relevant evidence, a process that includes the interrogation of suspects and witnesses. (2) For different reasons, neither of these approaches has been particularly successful in reaching its goal. The adversarial system has been based on too many unrealistic assumptions; the inquisitorial system lost much of its efficiency when physical coercion of suspects became unfashionable. Let me begin with the adversarial system. (3) Without a doubt, the partisan approach to gathering and presenting evidence is attractive, but its attraction lies on the surface rather than in its effectiveness at finding the truth. Ask any criminal lawyer worth his salt, and he will tell you that he prefers the adversarial mode because it permits him to actively help his client by digging up exonerating evidence and presenting it in court, as well as by challenging the evidence presented by the prosecution. Moreover, the adversarial trial gives him a much greater opportunity to demonstrate his prowess as a lawyer in open court. On a more theoretical level, the adversarial process places the defendant on an equal footing with the prosecutor and protects the defendant's autonomy by allowing him the same freedom of action in conducting his defense as the prosecutor enjoys in presenting the state's case. Finally, nothing can compare with the adversarial trial in demonstrating the importance of getting at the truth. The judge admonishes witnesses to be truthful, and they solemnly swear to say the truth. …" @default.
• W131933341 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W131933341 creator A5001070905 @default.
• W131933341 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W131933341 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W131933341 title "Is the Criminal Process about Truth?: A German Perspective" @default.
• W131933341 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W131933341 type Work @default.
• W131933341 sameAs 131933341 @default.
• W131933341 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W131933341 countsByYear W1319333412013 @default.
• W131933341 countsByYear W1319333412015 @default.
• W131933341 countsByYear W1319333412016 @default.
• W131933341 countsByYear W1319333412017 @default.
• W131933341 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W131933341 hasAuthorship W131933341A5001070905 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C2776119841 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C37736160 @default.
• W131933341 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C111472728 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C138885662 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C144024400 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C166957645 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C17744445 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C199539241 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C2776119841 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C2779343474 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C37736160 @default.
• W131933341 hasConceptScore W131933341C95457728 @default.
• W131933341 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W131933341 hasLocation W1319333411 @default.
• W131933341 hasOpenAccess W131933341 @default.
• W131933341 hasPrimaryLocation W1319333411 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W1493543646 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W1590199808 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W1628556245 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W1920594521 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W1993066664 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2059734584 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2135327513 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2194142898 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2207758077 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2241404273 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2282584852 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2334181841 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2342740082 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2418040022 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W2580148469 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W267606059 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W277948644 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W281223087 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W3125065832 @default.
• W131933341 hasRelatedWork W324369868 @default.
• W131933341 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W131933341 isParatext "false" @default.
• W131933341 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W131933341 magId "131933341" @default.
• W131933341 workType "article" @default.