FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W133319983> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W133319983 endingPage "283" @default.
• W133319983 startingPage "283" @default.
• W133319983 abstract "Recent theoretical work has examined ways that abstract idea of bodiless citizen has marked women and non-white Americans as outside boundaries of full citizenship, because attention paid to various markings of gender or race on their bodies precludes them from being categorized as unmarked, representative norm. Peggy Phelan most clearly explains rhetorical and imagistic gender marking, in process making a distinction between invisible marking of abstract value and visible bodily marking of difference: male is marked with value; female is unmarked, lacking measured value and me.... He is norm and therefore unremarkable; as Other, it is she whom he marks (5). As Deborah Tannen says, corporeally there is no unmarked woman because women's bodies and choices they make in of appearance and self-identification in public sphere always mark them in specific, gendered ways. Examining marking in light of political theory, Carole Pateman analyzes how language of Constitution, premised as it is on idea of social contract, accords white male citizen privilege of abstracting himself into concept of disembodied citizen, whereas women, in contrast, can never achieve this state of disembodiment because sexual contract precedes social contract. Drawing on such political theories, Lauren Berlant considers corporeal implications of theory of disembodied citizenship for racial and gendered subjects. When abstract, disembodied citizen is figured as white and male, all others cannot embody such citizenship because they are hyperembodied by racial and/or gendered markings visible on their bodies. Thus, women and African Americans, in particular, Berlant contends, have never had sign of real authority; that is, the power to suppress that body [i.e., facts of one's historical situation], to cover its tracks and its traces (113). Considered in light of this division between unmarked and marked, disembodied and hyperembodied, Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye can be read as a commentary on artificial boundaries of citizenship, gender, race, and history. While theories of Berlant, Pateman, and Phelan enable us to understand marking of boundaries of citizenship, race, and gender, difference between marked and unmarked history needs some explanation. Unmarked history refers to historical narrative that features as its prime actor deeds of abstract, disembodied citizen. Once this history is marked as having cultural value, its centrality is soon seen as unremarkable; that is, as representative. In order to centralize this one story, however, others need to be shifted to periphery and soon become remarkable only in their relation to center. According to Priscilla Wald, what unmarked history leaves out resurfaces when experiences of individuals conspicuously fall to conform to defini tion of personhood offered in narrative, and Morrison's Breedloves are certainly conspicuous for their ill-fitting selfhood. By carefully outlining history of their exclusion from terms of full and equal personhood, Morrison demonstrates that this family's unequal position is a product not of their intrinsic inadequacy, but rather of systematic reinforcement of a racial and gendered criteria for full citizenship (10). This critique, in turn, disrupts official stories that feature United States as a brave defender of democracy and staunch critic of racialized nationalism abroad. In setting her story of quest for and repercussions of Pecola Breedlove's desire for blue eyes and unmarked whiteness they represent against backdrop of World War II, Morrison recounts history of this significant year from vantage point of those who have been marked as peripheral in accounts of this era of American history. …" @default.
• W133319983 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W133319983 creator A5013996901 @default.
• W133319983 creator A5020688947 @default.
• W133319983 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W133319983 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W133319983 title "Focusing on the Wrong Front: Historical Displacement, the Maginot Line, and The Bluest Eye" @default.
• W133319983 cites W1530604260 @default.
• W133319983 cites W157183529 @default.
• W133319983 cites W1883634079 @default.
• W133319983 cites W1964098570 @default.
• W133319983 cites W1981403401 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2022096999 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2031532171 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2033249663 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2055616513 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2060036080 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2082558630 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2088983262 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2102936269 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2119042207 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2133483507 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2267790969 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2312444580 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2313865054 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2316337475 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2335412546 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2337603894 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2516341417 @default.
• W133319983 cites W2796161047 @default.
• W133319983 cites W3149549713 @default.
• W133319983 cites W577334751 @default.
• W133319983 cites W583386012 @default.
• W133319983 cites W618183633 @default.
• W133319983 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/1512261" @default.
• W133319983 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W133319983 type Work @default.
• W133319983 sameAs 133319983 @default.
• W133319983 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832012 @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832013 @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832014 @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832015 @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832019 @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832020 @default.
• W133319983 countsByYear W1333199832022 @default.
• W133319983 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W133319983 hasAuthorship W133319983A5013996901 @default.
• W133319983 hasAuthorship W133319983A5020688947 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C2777551076 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C2781403576 @default.
• W133319983 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C107551265 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C111368507 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C11171543 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C127313418 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C142362112 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C15744967 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C166957645 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C2777551076 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C2781403576 @default.
• W133319983 hasConceptScore W133319983C95457728 @default.
• W133319983 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W133319983 hasLocation W1333199831 @default.
• W133319983 hasOpenAccess W133319983 @default.
• W133319983 hasPrimaryLocation W1333199831 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W1532429061 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W1902839618 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W2318475058 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W2372011973 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W2380626688 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W2514277246 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W2981769826 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W4221023542 @default.
• W133319983 hasRelatedWork W4229513271 @default.
• W133319983 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W133319983 isParatext "false" @default.
• W133319983 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W133319983 magId "133319983" @default.
• W133319983 workType "article" @default.