FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W133762183> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W133762183 startingPage "649" @default.
• W133762183 abstract "I. Introduction This Note surveys how federal courts have analyzed Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 requirement of adequacy of representation in cases in which class counsel has violated ethical rules prohibiting solicitation. It concludes by postulating that denial of class certification is not a suitable solution for class counsel's violation of ethical rules for two reasons. First, current Model Rules of Professional Conduct (Model Rules) prohibiting solicitation and class action device serve cross purposes, particularly in small claims class actions in which some form of solicitation is needed to overcome financial disincentive of bringing suit. Second, rather than enforcing Model Rules by denying class certification, courts can fashion other remedies that more directly target problem behavior without prejudicing class. Jason Sturkie was critically injured in a USAir jet crash in Charlotte, N.C. on July 2, 1994. His emotionally distraught father was called away from his son's bedside in Charlotte to pick up a piece of certified mail at post office in his hometown of Leesville, S.C. Thinking it could be mail from USAir, Mr. Sturkie left his son. went up to get package. I made a special trip from Charlotte, where my son was in critical condition, wondering what could be all about, said Mr. Sturkie. The parcel turned out to be from a law firm soliciting his participation in a lawsuit. There's a big package with a videotape and their resume, he recalls. bothered me, yes. That bothered me to no end.1 Then, after Valujet crash in Florida in May 1996, account appeared in New York Times:2 Victoria Cummock, a victims' advocate, was called in by National Transportation Safety Board to aid victims' families. After boarding a bus that took families to a memorial service, Ms. Cummock said she saw this one woman just hysterically crying. The woman, a Venezuelan whose brother had died in crash, said she had been warned by someone to hire a lawyer for her sister-in-law immediately, before critical evidence vanished. The adviser was later identified as a lawyer's employee. She said, `They tell me I have to make a decision before I leave, and I don't know that much about American system.'3 Has exercise of attorneys' commercial speech rights under 1st Amendment adversely impacted image of lawyers? The Supreme Court thought so. After Florida Bar presented Court with an anecdotal study connecting public's low regard for with lawyers' advertising, Court upheld Florida's newly enacted 30-day ban on direct mail solicitation4 to mass accident victims.5 The holding in Florida Bar represented a departure from a line of cases from 1970s and 1980s extending 1 st Amendment protection to lawyer advertising.6 In Florida Bar, Supreme Court constitutionalized state regulation of attorney advertising when state formulates regulation in such a way that it protects the flagging reputations of ... lawyers by preventing them from engaging in conduct that is universally regarded as deplorable and beneath common decency.7 The Court had little trouble holding that Bar's interest in protecting reputations of from harm was substantial; accordingly, regulation withstood constitutional challenge.8 Perhaps Florida Bar signals a turn in trend of legal advertising protection. This decision and a handful of recent criminal prosecutions for violations of state barratry provisions, as well as public concern about our litigious society, suggest that a witch-hunt on solicitation may be gaining momentum. Some states are bringing their criminal barratry statutes out of dormancy in an effort to curb attorney solicitation. For example, in USAir disaster mentioned above, John O'Quinn was charged with violating South Carolina's criminal barratry statute,9 and in 1993, Texas Legislature amended Texas' criminal barratry statute to enable state to prosecute barratry as a third-degree felony. …" @default.
• W133762183 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W133762183 creator A5045691097 @default.
• W133762183 date "2000-07-01" @default.
• W133762183 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W133762183 title "Solicitation in Class Actions: Should Class Certification Be Denied Because Class Counsel Solicited the Class Representative?" @default.
• W133762183 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W133762183 type Work @default.
• W133762183 sameAs 133762183 @default.
• W133762183 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W133762183 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W133762183 hasAuthorship W133762183A5045691097 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C2776687834 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C2777212361 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C2780900520 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W133762183 hasConcept C538833194 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C11171543 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C11413529 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C144024400 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C154945302 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C15744967 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C17744445 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C199539241 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C2776687834 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C2777134139 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C2777212361 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C2780900520 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C41008148 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C46304622 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C48103436 @default.
• W133762183 hasConceptScore W133762183C538833194 @default.
• W133762183 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W133762183 hasLocation W1337621831 @default.
• W133762183 hasOpenAccess W133762183 @default.
• W133762183 hasPrimaryLocation W1337621831 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W129040843 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W133805412 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W1482586495 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W1589808793 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W183439743 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W2074913465 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W2108794581 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W2165263839 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W218702994 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W2262617141 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W2291327564 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W2306593025 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W275728422 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W3021903093 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W305999546 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W308234495 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W3125030736 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W334418687 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W383354263 @default.
• W133762183 hasRelatedWork W97709631 @default.
• W133762183 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W133762183 isParatext "false" @default.
• W133762183 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W133762183 magId "133762183" @default.
• W133762183 workType "article" @default.