FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W135031091> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W135031091 abstract "Objectives To identify gaps in the current research on long-term care (LTC) for older adults that limited the conclusions of the comparative effectiveness review (CER) “Long-Term Care for Older Adults: A Review of Home and Community-Based Services Versus Institutional Care” in order to inform those who conduct and fund research about the research needs on this topic. Methods We used a deliberative process to identify specific research needs and research design considerations. We refined a list of evidence gaps from the CER and recruited a diverse stakeholder panel to supplement this list of gaps. Based on stakeholder feedback about the current policy environment and consumer preference for home and community-based services (HCBS), we developed two sets of research questions and separated each set into methodological questions and topical questions. The first set addressed the topic of the CER, which was the comparison of LTC for older adults delivered through HCBS and in nursing homes (NHs). The second set addressed broader LTC issues that stakeholders raised as salient for the current policy environment; this set framed questions about these settings and services separately rather than as a comparison. We sent both sets of research questions to stakeholders to rank by priority, and we calculated unweighted and weighted scores based on their rankings. We identified breakpoints in the weighted rankings that separated high- and moderate-/low-priority research questions. Highly prioritized research questions were considered research needs. We discussed research design considerations for research needs. Results Of 13 stakeholders invited to participate, 10 completed the ranking exercise. Among the methodological questions for the comparison of LTC delivered through HCBS and in NHs, the identification of standardized outcome measures for HCBS and NH recipients was the highest priority. For the broader set of methodological questions about LTC through HCBS and in NHs, the highest rankings were given to four questions related to outcome measures and descriptions of the interventions. For the topical questions for the comparison of LTC delivered through HCBS and in NHs, the highest rankings were given to questions related to the pattern of transitions for LTC uses, and the factors leading to transitions. We also identified four high-priority topical questions primarily related to the populations that benefit most from interventions and the types of interventions that lead to improved outcomes. Future studies on LTC for older adults should aim to reduce bias as much as possible through research design and statistical techniques. Larger sample sizes will allow more research on subpopulations, and longer followup times will allow a better understanding of how interventions may modify outcomes over time. Conclusions The clinical and policy context of LTC is changing. Comparative effectiveness may be less salient than understanding what makes such care effective in the first place for various client groups. Therefore, we reported research needs related to the comparison of HCBS and NH care that was the focus of the CER, and we also reported research needs from the broader set of questions that stakeholders deemed important within the current policy environment. Future research in this area will create a broader and stronger evidence base for making care and policy decisions." @default.
• W135031091 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W135031091 creator A5007262898 @default.
• W135031091 creator A5010559732 @default.
• W135031091 creator A5043335884 @default.
• W135031091 creator A5053253768 @default.
• W135031091 date "2013-12-20" @default.
• W135031091 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W135031091 title "Long-Term Care for Older Adults: Future Research Needs: Identification of Future Research Needs From Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 81" @default.
• W135031091 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24354020" @default.
• W135031091 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W135031091 type Work @default.
• W135031091 sameAs 135031091 @default.
• W135031091 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W135031091 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W135031091 hasAuthorship W135031091A5007262898 @default.
• W135031091 hasAuthorship W135031091A5010559732 @default.
• W135031091 hasAuthorship W135031091A5043335884 @default.
• W135031091 hasAuthorship W135031091A5053253768 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C2779318504 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C2780233487 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W135031091 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C116834253 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C144024400 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C15744967 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C159110408 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C162324750 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C175444787 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C177264268 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C17744445 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C199360897 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C201305675 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C2779318504 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C2780233487 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C2781249084 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C36289849 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C39549134 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C41008148 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C59822182 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C71924100 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C74909509 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C75630572 @default.
• W135031091 hasConceptScore W135031091C86803240 @default.
• W135031091 hasLocation W1350310911 @default.
• W135031091 hasOpenAccess W135031091 @default.
• W135031091 hasPrimaryLocation W1350310911 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W1564774957 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2028843401 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2059591424 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2107667881 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2126717870 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2126865876 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2183290182 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2770849830 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2785603146 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2888586537 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W2996243719 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3013308129 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3041821249 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3043779430 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3082315623 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3097784643 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3109464655 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3119570078 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3164879210 @default.
• W135031091 hasRelatedWork W3183137864 @default.
• W135031091 isParatext "false" @default.
• W135031091 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W135031091 magId "135031091" @default.
• W135031091 workType "article" @default.