FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W13622461> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W13622461 endingPage "138" @default.
• W13622461 startingPage "136" @default.
• W13622461 abstract "Objective To evaluate common laboratory transcription errors made in requisition forms and rate of report failure in test result reports. Design Descriptive study. Place and duration of study Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC) from February 01, till February 28, 2002. Patients and methods One hundred and eight patient s records were collected randomly from 24 different departments of the hospital, during the month of February 2002. Each record was scrutinized for requisition slips and test reports. Tabulation of the content matter of all requisition slips and the test reports was done on the spread sheet, for the transcription errors; and compared with the minimum standards of requisition forms, as laid down by clinical laboratory improvement amendments; 1988 (CLIA 88). Request forms on which urgent test/any comment was given, were tabulated separately. Differences in the number of tests ordered and actually performed were also tabulated. Percentage of error was calculated. Results Four hundred and sixty-nine test request forms, requesting 1112 tests, were analyzed. None of them had pre-formatted laboratory forms. They were written on torn file papers, Out-patient department (OPD) slips and plain papers. The transcription errors included physician s identification errors (469/469 or 100%), patient s name, age, sex and unique identifier errors (0, 94, 95 and 81%) respectively, error in patients data aiding diagnosis (100%) and report failure error (37%). The requesting pattern of the laboratory tests ordered by clinicians revealed inclination towards panel-test ordering. The results of requested tests were available in 63% requested tests, and not available in 37% tests. No reason for rejection of the specimen was found on feed-back/report. Further analysis of un-reported results revealed that the emergency tests of electrolytes and sugar were the most affected ones, followed by PT/APTT, ESR and urine analysis. Tests for serum electrolytes done in elective and emergency setup, showed that out of 152 test requests for electrolytes, 124 requests were sent in elective and 28 in emergency setup. There was report failure in 84 cases (67.7%) in former and 13 cases (46.4%) in the latter. Conclusion A good insight on error-prone steps in the laboratory process is essential to achieve error reduction; hence, in addition to maintaining quality standards within laboratory, it is imperative to go outside the laboratory to identify the common errors made in laboratory process and to reorganize the activity of the wards." @default.
• W13622461 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W13622461 creator A5056421044 @default.
• W13622461 date "2006-02-01" @default.
• W13622461 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W13622461 title "Laboratory errors as judged by test request slips and test reports." @default.
• W13622461 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16499809" @default.
• W13622461 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W13622461 type Work @default.
• W13622461 sameAs 13622461 @default.
• W13622461 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W13622461 countsByYear W136224612012 @default.
• W13622461 countsByYear W136224612016 @default.
• W13622461 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W13622461 hasAuthorship W13622461A5056421044 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C195319763 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W13622461 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C105795698 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C151730666 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C166957645 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C195319763 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C2777267654 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C33923547 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C71924100 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C86803240 @default.
• W13622461 hasConceptScore W13622461C95457728 @default.
• W13622461 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W13622461 hasLocation W136224611 @default.
• W13622461 hasLocation W136224612 @default.
• W13622461 hasOpenAccess W13622461 @default.
• W13622461 hasPrimaryLocation W136224611 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W1820621702 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2003497303 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W20537360 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2096014681 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2101221343 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2123827681 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2151100782 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2153021821 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2183718494 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2331317958 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2408993193 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2415441291 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2418230664 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2428338639 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2587344094 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W2804548583 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W3016905938 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W3030154903 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W3031068078 @default.
• W13622461 hasRelatedWork W1801998043 @default.
• W13622461 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W13622461 isParatext "false" @default.
• W13622461 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W13622461 magId "13622461" @default.
• W13622461 workType "article" @default.