FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W136547926> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W136547926 abstract "Introduction. Unintended as it was, the European Court of Justice (ECJ, the Court, the Court of the EU) has played an extremely important role in the construction of the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ). The AFSJ was set up by the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1997 and only entered into force in May 1999. The fact that this is a new field of EU competence, poses afresh all the fundamental questions – both political and legal – triggered by European integration, namely in terms of: a) distribution of powers between the Union and its Member States, b) attribution of competences between the various EU Institutions, c) direct effect and supremacy of EU rules, d) scope of competence of the ECJ, and e) extent of the protection given to fundamental rights. The above questions have prompted judicial solutions which take into account both the extremely sensible fields of law upon which the AFSJ is anchored, and the EU’s highly inconvenient three-pillar institutional framework.1The ECJ is the body whose institutional role is to benefit most from this upcoming ‘depilarisation’, possibly more than that of the European Parliament. This structure is on the verge of being abandoned, provided the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force.2 However spectacular this formal boost of the Court’s competence, the changes in real terms are not going to be that dramatic. This apparent contradiction is explained, to a large extent, by the fact that the Court has in many ways ‘provoked’, or even ‘anticipated’, the depilarisation of its own jurisdictional role, already under the existing three-pillar structure. Simply put, under the new – post Treaty of Lisbon – regime, the Court will have full jurisdiction over all AFSJ matters, as those are going to be fully integrated in what is now the first pillar. Some limitations will continue to apply, however, while a special AFSJ procedure will be institutionalised. Indeed, if we look into the new Treaty we may identify general modifications to the Court’s structure and jurisdiction affecting the AFSJ (section 2), modifications in the field of the AFSJ stemming from the abolition of the pillar structure (section 3) and, finally, some rules specifically applicable to the AFSJ (section 4)." @default.
• W136547926 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W136547926 creator A5057944415 @default.
• W136547926 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W136547926 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W136547926 title "Casual but Smart: The Court’s new clothes in the Area of Freedom Security and Justice (AFSJ) after the Lisbon Treaty. Research Papers in Law, 2/2008" @default.
• W136547926 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W136547926 type Work @default.
• W136547926 sameAs 136547926 @default.
• W136547926 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W136547926 countsByYear W1365479262013 @default.
• W136547926 countsByYear W1365479262015 @default.
• W136547926 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W136547926 hasAuthorship W136547926A5057944415 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C105639569 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C115314567 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C2776212127 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C2781440851 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W136547926 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C105639569 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C115314567 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C144024400 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C162324750 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C17744445 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C190253527 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C199539241 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C2776212127 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C2779010840 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C2781440851 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C2910001868 @default.
• W136547926 hasConceptScore W136547926C94625758 @default.
• W136547926 hasLocation W1365479261 @default.
• W136547926 hasOpenAccess W136547926 @default.
• W136547926 hasPrimaryLocation W1365479261 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W1515894490 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W1556048736 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W168683206 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W1767359944 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W1976396642 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2005748209 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W200746793 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2096036029 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2145181823 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2152312847 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2166021080 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W226413198 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2560299393 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2578282480 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2896523508 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W294790596 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W3124756885 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W1792428842 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2102034824 @default.
• W136547926 hasRelatedWork W2313165206 @default.
• W136547926 isParatext "false" @default.
• W136547926 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W136547926 magId "136547926" @default.
• W136547926 workType "article" @default.