FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W137152592> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W137152592 startingPage "55" @default.
• W137152592 abstract "Systematic interest in motivation to emerged from the addictions field due to low rates of treatment compliance. This was commonly conceptualised as a motivational problem (Hettema, Steele, & Miller, 2005) and viewed as a stable personality trait (Miller, 1985). In the late 1970s this paradigm shifted following research that demonstrated clients' intrapsychic characteristics played a minor role compared to therapist variables in predicting client motivation and subsequent treatment outcome (Miller, 1985). These studies redirected interest in the therapist's ability to foster client motivation to change. Interest was stimulated in other fields, including correctional rehabilitation, where offenders were viewed as lacking the requisite motivation to their harmful behaviour. Within the correctional rehabilitation field, and parallel to this burgeoning interest in motivation, a number of studies were accumulating that supported the effectiveness of rehabilitation to reduce recidivism (Andrews, 1995; Dowden & Andrews, 1999; 2000; MacKenzie, 2006). From these studies, three principles for effective correctional rehabilitation emerged. The first of these principles, risk, posits that offenders who are more likely to re-offend benefit from intensive highly resourced interventions, while those who are less likely to re-offend benefit from less intensive interventions. The second principle states that effective correctional programmes focus on offenders' needs. These needs are a component of an offender's risk of recidivism; they are malleable and can be either rehabilitative (predictive of offending) or not rehabilitative. The final principle, responsivity, states that correctional intervention needs to be delivered in a style and mode that is commensurate with the offender's ability and method of learning (Andrews & Bonta, 2010). Whilst the responsivity principle incorporates a number of constructs, motivation is one of its key precepts (Day & Howells, 2007). Within the growing correctional rehabilitation literature, motivation was identified as an important factor in offender engagement and, in turn, improved treatment outcome (Ginsburg, Mann, Rotgers, & Weekes, 2002; Harper & Hardy, 2000; Levesque, 1998; McMurran, 2002; McMurran, Tyler, Hogue, Cooper, Dunseath, & McDaid, 1998; Murphy & Baxter, 1997). This has paralleled a growing realisation of the ubiquity of low motivation to among prison populations (Polaschek, Anstiss, & Wilson, 2010). As such, the re-conceptualisation of motivation as an interpersonal process (Miller, 1985) and the correctional principle of responsivity (Andrews & Bonta, 2010) has fuelled interest in motivational interventions, particularly motivational interviewing, as an intervention method for offenders (McMurran, 2009). Motivational Interviewing Motivational interviewing was explicated in the late 1970s and early 1980s and is defined as a collaborative, person-centered form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation for change (Miller & Rollnick, 2009, p. 137). Motivational interviewing aimed to increase motivation to and effect behaviour change, such as a reduction in drop-out rates and the amelioration of presenting problems. Miller (1 983) proposed that motivational interviewing stemmed from experimental social psychology and other psychological theories, such as causal attributions (Weiner, 1986), cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957), and self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1977). Drawing from these theories, and clinical experience, Miller and Rollnick (2002) developed a framework whereby effective motivational interviewing is constituted by its spirit, principles and skills. The spirit of motivational interviewing is defined by the concepts of collaboration, evocation and autonomy. Collaboration is premised on the clinician and client working together in a partner-like relationship. Evocation emphasises the clinician's role of eliciting the client's own expertise and solutions. …" @default.
• W137152592 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W137152592 creator A5019737172 @default.
• W137152592 creator A5052975057 @default.
• W137152592 creator A5072316436 @default.
• W137152592 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W137152592 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W137152592 title "The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing with Offenders: An Outcome Evaluation" @default.
• W137152592 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W137152592 type Work @default.
• W137152592 sameAs 137152592 @default.
• W137152592 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W137152592 countsByYear W1371525922012 @default.
• W137152592 countsByYear W1371525922014 @default.
• W137152592 countsByYear W1371525922016 @default.
• W137152592 countsByYear W1371525922018 @default.
• W137152592 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W137152592 hasAuthorship W137152592A5019737172 @default.
• W137152592 hasAuthorship W137152592A5052975057 @default.
• W137152592 hasAuthorship W137152592A5072316436 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C2776090404 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C2777016617 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C2777496998 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C48856860 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W137152592 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C118552586 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C15744967 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C169760540 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C18903297 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C27415008 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C2776090404 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C2777016617 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C2777496998 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C2778818304 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C2780665704 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C48856860 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C542102704 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C70410870 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C77805123 @default.
• W137152592 hasConceptScore W137152592C86803240 @default.
• W137152592 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W137152592 hasLocation W1371525921 @default.
• W137152592 hasOpenAccess W137152592 @default.
• W137152592 hasPrimaryLocation W1371525921 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W1489060081 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W1968009348 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2002176202 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2004840617 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2016973357 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2024280990 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2039808302 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2045324832 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2082720499 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2108384017 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2142565811 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2254899682 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2289833273 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2320886663 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2556236176 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2674979456 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W3158917804 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W3162387590 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W585205044 @default.
• W137152592 hasRelatedWork W2506610777 @default.
• W137152592 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W137152592 isParatext "false" @default.
• W137152592 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W137152592 magId "137152592" @default.
• W137152592 workType "article" @default.